(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 4. Functional analysis reveals that fgf8 and fgf24 are together required for posterior mesodermal development. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry in 10-somite stage wild-type (A), fgf24MO embryos (B), fgf8- (C) and fgf8-;fgf24MO embryos (D). In A-D, pax2.1, krx20 and myod are stained purple, and Ntl protein is stained brown. At this stage in wild-type embryos, pax2.1 is expressed in the mid-hindbrain boundary (MHB), the otic placode and precursors of the pronephric ducts (black asterisks), krx20 in rhombomeres 3 and 5 (white asterisks), myod in adaxial cells (arrowhead) and a subset of cells in the forming somites (arrow), and Ntl protein in the developing notochord. At this stage, fgf24MO embryos (B) are indistinguishable from wild type, while fgf8 mutants (C) have reduced expression of pax2.1 in the MHB, and a reduced number of cells expressing myod in the forming somites. By contrast, fgf8-;fgf24MO embryos (D) have significantly reduced numbers of myod- (arrow), pax2.1- (asterisks) and Ntl-expressing cells relative to wild-type, fgf24MO and fgf8-;fgf24MO embryos. (E-H) Live wild-type and mutant embryos at 24 hpf. fgf24MO embryos (F) are morphologically indistinguishable from wild-type embryos (E), while fgf8- embryos (G) have a slightly shorter tail and a prominent MHB defect (arrowhead). fgf8-;fgf24MO embryos (H) have MHB defect (arrowhead), and produce significantly less posterior tissue than either fgf8 mutant or fgf24MO embryos. Scale bars: in A, 50 µm for A-D; in E, 100 µm for E-H.