(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 7. Mad and Drosophila CrebB proteins bind in vitro to the XC enhancer. (A) Gelshift experiments with Mad protein [50 ng (+) or 200 ng (++)] were performed on double-stranded oligonucleotides corresponding to wild-type or mutated (DRS2m) versions of DRS2, in the presence or absence of a 500-fold excess of cold DRS2 competitor. Lanes 1-3 show a dose-dependent binding of Mad to DRS2. Lanes 4-7 indicate that binding is competed by cold DRS2 (lanes 4 and 5), and that the integrity of the DRS2 site is required for Mad binding (lanes 6-7). (B) Similar experiments on double-stranded oligonucleotides corresponding to the wild-type or mutated (DRS1m) version of DRS1. Compared with the experiments in A, this gelshift shows that Mad protein binds DRS2 with a stronger affinity than DRS1. (C) Gelshift experiments with Drosophila CrebB protein [20 ng (+) or 100 ng (++)] were performed on double-stranded oligonucleotides corresponding to wild-type (Creb1-2) or mutated (Creb1-2m) versions of Creb-binding sites, in the presence or absence of a 500-fold excess of cold Creb1-2 competitor. Lanes 1-3 show a dose-dependent binding of Drosophila CrebB. Lanes 4-7 indicate that the binding of Drosophila CrebB is competed by the competitor, and that the integrity of the two Creb binding sites is required for binding to occur.