(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 9. (A-C) Analysis of SOP development in the notum of PsnC1 HE31 double mutant wing imaginal discs. Anterior is towards the left, ventral is to the bottom. Expression of Sens is revealed by antibody staining. (A) Expression of Sens is strongly reduced or absent in the PsnC1 HE31 double mutant proneural clusters. (B) The cells of the double mutant clusters still express the SOP-E (arrows), indicating that they are present. (C) The same disc as in A and B, showing expression of the SOP-E in green and of Sens in red. The analysis indicates that, in the double mutant discs, SOP development arrests in a similar manner as in Su(H) mutants. (D,E) Expression of UAS Su(H)VP16 with dppGal4 in wing imaginal discs of the late third larval instar stage. (D) Expression of sens. Expression of Sens is lost in most SOPs of the notum. Compare with Fig. 2E for normal expression of sens. The arrow indicates ectopic expression of Sens in the wing area, which is a result of the ectopic induction of the wing margin and bristles by UAS Su(H)VP16 (Klein et al., 2000; Furriols et al., 2000). (E) Expression of UAS GFP in a disc of the same genotype as in D, showing that the expression of dppGal4 has expanded over most of the notum. (F) A PsnC1 mutant wing imaginal disc where UAS Su(H){Delta}H is expressed with scaGal4. The discs is stained by anti Hnt antibody staining. No expression of Hnt is observed in the region of the notum. (G) The same disc as in F showing expression of Hnt in red and of GFP in green. The expression of the GFP marks the cells of the proneural clusters. This result shows that although the cells of the clusters are present, they fail to develop to the stage at which Hnt expression is initiated. Thus, the expression of UAS Su(H){Delta}H result in an arrest of SOP development in a similar manner as in Psn H double mutants. (H) Summary of the results shown in this picture. The results suggest that Su(H) suppresses the expression of a negative regulator of sens. For this function, Su(H) requires the presence of H. Recent evidence by Barolo et al. (Barolo et al., 2002) indicates that H acts as a bridge between Su(H) and its co-repressors Groucho (Gro) and CtBP. It is likely that Gro and CtBP are also part of the repressor complex required for the proper expression of sens.