(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 3. Phenotype of p63–/–cervicovaginal epithelium (CVE). I. Epithelial morphology. The p63–/– CVE was columnar and developed deep inclusions or glands (black arrows). The p63–/–cervicovaginal grafts in the ovariectomized hosts showed uterine-like epithelial morphology (A). When the hosts were treated with E2, the glandular p63–/– CVE remained columnar but became hyperplastic (B). II. Cervicovaginal epithelial markers. Markers for squamous differentiation [p63 (C,D) and K14 (E,F)] and keratinization [K10 (G,H) and involucrin (I,J)] were assessed in p63+ (C,E,G,I) and p63–/– (D,F,H,J) cervicovaginal grafts by IHC. The p63–/– CVE failed to express squamous and keratinization markers. III. Common markers for uterine and cervicovaginal epithelia. Markers common for UtE and CVE [ER{alpha} (K,L) and p130 (M,N)] were examined in p63+ (K,M) and p63–/– (L,N) cervicovaginal grafts by IHC. Both p63+ and p63–/– CVE strongly expressed ER{alpha} and p130. IV. Regulation of PR by E2. Expression of PR was assessed by IHC in p63+ (O,Q) and p63–/– (P,R) cervicovaginal grafts in the ovariectomized (–E2, O and P) or E2-treated ovariectomized (+E2, Q and R) hosts. In the p63+ CVE, PR was detectable only when the host was treated with E2 (compare O with Q). By contrast, p63–/– CVE expressed a high level of PR in the absence of E2 (P), which is a unique phenotype of uterine epithelium. V. VgM/UtE tissue recombination. Tissue recombinants were made with UtE and VgM from E17 p63–/– and p63+ embryos. Expression of p63 was examined in the tissue recombinants. The p63+ UtE developed into normal vaginal epithelium and expressed p63 when it was recombined with p63–/– VgM (S). By contrast, p63–/– UtE recombined p63+ VgM failed to undergo squamous differentiation (T). Scale bar: 50 µm.