(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 1. Isolation of the site of incipient leaf formation (I1) from the meristem affects phyllotaxis. (A,E-I) Scanning electron micrographs (SEM); (B-D) light stereomicrographs. (A) Tomato meristem in top view. The site of incipient leaf formation (I1), which can be predicted to be on the upper left part of the meristem (white arrowhead), was separated from the remainder of the meristem by an incision (black arrowhead) just before imaging. (B) Tomato apex just after operation as in A. (C) The same apex as is shown in B 1 day after operation. (D) The same apex as is shown in B, 3 days after operation. P1 was removed to expose the meristem. I2 has initiated at the expected position. Note an apparent post-meristematic increase in the divergence angle between P1 and P2 (blue lines), compare with (B). (E) The same apex as is shown in B, 6 days after operation. Note that I2 (bottom) and I3 (top) diverge by approximately 180°. (F) Control apex with normal divergence angle between I2 and I3. (G) Tomato apex 6 days after operation as in A. Note the extended width of the I3 primordium. (H) Apex 6 days after operation as in A. The vertical distance between I1 and I2, is strongly increased compared with a control (I). P3 and P2 indicate the bases of pre-existing leaf primordia that were removed at the beginning of the experiment, and P1 represents the youngest primordium; I1, I2 and I3 indicate primordia formed after the operation. Black arrowheads indicate the incisions. Blue lines in B and D represent the divergence angle between P1 and P2. Scale bar: 100 µm.