Fig. 5. Wingless sets up a region competent to express Slouch and is required later
to specify the fate of cluster II. (A) Late stage 11 wgCX4
mutant embryos fail to maintain Twist at high levels. (B) Ectopic Twist
expression in wgCX4 mutant embryos maintains Twist
expression through stage 11. (C) Late stage 11 wgCX4
mutant embryo showed loss of all mesodermal Slouch, although some expression
remained in the CNS. cI (black arrowhead) and cII (white arrowhead) are
indicated in both the panel and the inset. Black arrows denote the midline in
the panel; black arrows in C',D' and white arrows in
C'',D'' show Slouch-expressing CNS cells in the insets. (C)
Immunocytochemical staining of a single hemisegment shows that both cII and cI
are missing. (C'') Confocal micrographs of embryos stained with
antibodies to Slouch (green/FITC) and Kr (red/Cy3). No co-localization of Kr
and Slouch is detected in the mesoderm. White arrow indicates Slouch CNS
expression. (D) wgCX4,twiGAL4>UAStwi embryos showed
rescue of mesodermal Slouch expression in positions corresponding to cI.
(D') Immunocytochemical staining shows that cII is absent but cI is
present (black arrowhead). (D'') Confocal micrograph of a single
hemisegment shows that Slouch staining is absent from the normal position of
cII, and Slouch (green/FITC) does not co-localize with Kr (red/Cy3),
supporting the identity of this cluster as cI (black arrowhead). We note that
the amount of Twist maintained in these cells after specification is
detrimental. While Twist is necessary for the specification of the Slouch
clusters, maintained elevated expression can lead to repression of these
clusters (V.T.C. and M.K.B., unpublished). (B) Quantification of Slouch
cluster rescue in wg mutant embryos that overexpress twist.
Graphs show percentage of hemisegments in which cI (blue) or cII (red) are
present under conditions listed at the bottom of the graph. n, number
of hemisegments counted.