(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 5. Proximal transgene expression is dependent upon conserved E-boxes and bHLH activity, but E-boxes alone are not sufficient for retinal expression. (A) Sequential deletions of the Xath5 proximal region: pG1X5-proximal-401 provided robust retinal GFP expression while pG1X5-proximal-389, -349 and -337 drove weaker retinal expression and at reduced frequency. (B) Mutation of either E1 or E2 ({Delta}E) reduced the percentage of embryos expressing GFP while mutation of both eliminated all transgene expression. (C-E) Injection of RNA for the dominant-negative Xath5-EnR suppressed expression of the pG1X5-proximal GFP transgene on the injected side (D) compared with the uninjected side (C). RNA encoding RFP (red) was co-injected to mark the injected side (E). (F) Multimerized E-boxes (pG1X5-TATAA+2xE1E2) were not sufficient to promote expression, while the E-boxes and adjacent {alpha}-box (pG1X5-TATAA+33 bp) promoted non-specific GFP expression throughout the CNS and head musculature (GFP+ overall), but did not promote specific retinal expression. The pG1X5-TATAA+48 bp transgenic construct promoted GFP expression in a Xath5-like pattern, but also in the axial somites, with a small percentage only showing expression in axial somites (contributing to the increase in overall GFP+ embryos). The robustness of transgene expression was reduced by mutation of the {alpha}-box with the pG1X5-TATAA+48 bp transgenic construct. (G) pG1X5-TATAA+33 bp is expressed non-specifically in CNS and muscle (H) pG1X5-TATAA+48 bp transgene is expressed in Xath5-like pattern and in axial somites. Asterisk indicates gut autofluorescence.