(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 5


Fig. 5. The cytoplasmic domain of Fra is not required for proper localization. (A-E') Stage 16 embryos stained with BP102 to visualize all axons. (C'-E') Same embryos as C-E. Staining with anti-Myc or anti-HA reveals Fra receptor expression. Anterior is up. (A) Wild-type embryos stained with BP102 exhibit a ladder-like CNS scaffold with distinct thick anterior and posterior commissures. (B) Commissural bundles are thin or absent in fra mutant embryos (arrowheads). (C) Expressing a full length Fra receptor in all neurons using elavGal4 rescues fra mutant defects. (C') Wild-type Fra localizes to the axons scaffold when expressed in all neurons. (D) When a weak insert of Fra{Delta}C is expressed panneurally in a fra mutant background, many axons fail to cross the midline (arrowheads). (D') Despite the inability of Fra{Delta}C to rescue fra guidance defects, this truncated receptor is still localized to the axon scaffold as well as the wild-type full-length receptor. (E) Expression of Fra{Delta}CRobo67Myc does not rescue the defects seen in fra mutant embryos (arrowheads); however, in contrast to Fra{Delta}C, Fra{Delta}CRobo67Myc does not efficiently localize to axons (E') perhaps because the exongenous Robo sequence interferes with normal Fra receptor distribution.