Fig. 7. Ttrap knockdown modulates Nodal-Alk4 signaling. (A) Ttrap
knockdown increases activity of ARE-luciferase reporter. ARE-lux plasmid (50
pg) was co-injected with TtrapMO (or controlMO) and
embryo lysates assayed for luciferase at shield stage. Knockdown results in
fivefold greater induction relative to control (4.6±2.5;
P
0.01; Student's unpaired t-test; eight independent
experiments). No significant increase in luciferase was detectable for control
pGL3. (B) TtrapMO potentiates ARE-lux by sqt or cyc. This
experiment was performed as described in A, this time in combination with
sqt or cyc mRNA injection (11 pg). The addition of
TtrapMO induced ARE-lux an additional tenfold relative to induction
by either one of the ligands [81.0±15.6 (ARE+sqt+TtrapMO) vs
9.0±2.6 (ARE+sqt); 38.0±8.6 (ARE+cyc+TtrapMO) vs
3.8±0.8 (are+cyc); P
0.0001, One-way analysis of variance
(ANOVA)]. y-axis, fold-induction of luciferase. (C-F)
bon is visibly upregulated in TtrapMO and
Smad3bOE embryos; WISH at 50% epiboly, animal views (asterisks).
(G,H) TtrapMO-mediated increase in bon
expression depends on intact alk4 activity. (G) TtrapMO embryo
shows strong expression of bon, whereas (H) TtrapMO embryo
treated with SB431542 no longer expresses bon. Animal views
(asterisks). (I-N) Overexpression of Smad3b causes CE and epiboly
defects. WISH at 90% epiboly, paraxial mesoderm marker expression in
βgalOE (700 pg) and Smad3bOE (700 pg) embryos.
Dorsal-posterior views, anterior at top. (I,L) papc cells fail to
converge near the midline in Smad3bOE embryos compared with control
βgalOE embryos. Arrowheads indicate blastopore opening, which
is wider in Smad3bOE embryos. (J,M) Distance between myod
cells is greater in Smad3bOE relative to control embryos
(double-headed arrows). (K,N) Live observation of β-galOE and
Smad3bOE embryos, 90% epiboly. (K) Control β-galOE
embryo displaying normal epiboly and nearing blastopore closure. (N)
Smad3bOE embryo showing severe delay in epiboly. Red arrowheads,
edge of blastoderm margin. Lateral views, anterior at top. Note that the
gastrulation defects depicted here are at an earlier timepoint than those
shown for TtrapMO embryos (see
Fig. 2). Importantly however,
the same gastrulation defects were also observed for TtrapMO
embryos at this earlier stage (i.e. 90% epiboly).