Fig. 4. gtaC- null cells exhibit DIF responses that are
absent from dimA- mutant cells. (A) Alignment
of the GATA DNA-binding domain of GtaC with the DNA-binding domain of mouse
GATA1, Drosophila Pannier and Neurospera WC-2. (B)
Schematic of the gtaC gene and gene disruption. The region encoding
the GATA DNA-binding domain is shaded black, poly asparagine repeats are blue
and poly glutamines are green. Approximately three-quarters of the
gtaC-coding sequence was replaced with a blasticidin cassette,
including the predicted GATA DNA-binding domain. (C) Measurement of DIF
responsive gene expression in monolayer assays. Expression of prestalk markers
(ecmA and ecmB) and prespore markers (psA and
cotB) was measured by qPCR. Cells were treated with cAMP for 9 hours
before addition of DIF for 1 (ecmA and ecmB) or 3 hours
(psA and cotB). gtaC- cells exhibit
responses comparable with those of wild-type cells, whereas no responses were
seen in dimA- cells. Results shown are from one
experiment. Comparable results were seen in at least three independent
experiments. (D) DIF responsive gene expression in dissociated cell
assays. Mound stage cells were dissociated before shaking in cAMP with or
without DIF for 2 hours. Expression of prestalk markers (ecmA and
ecmB) and prespore markers (psA and cotB) was
measured by qPCR. gtaC- cells exhibit comparable responses
with those of wild-type cells, whereas no responses were seen in
dimA- cells. Results shown are from one representative
experiment. Comparable results were seen in at least three independent
experiments.