|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Journal Articles |
Lamprey embryos were obtained by artificial fertilization to ascertain the contributions made by the neural crest to the head skeleton. Early-neurula-stage embryos of Petromyzon marinus were subjected to neural crest extirpation along the anterior half from one of seven zones, raised to a larval stage at which control larvae exhibit well-developed skeletons and analysed by light microscopy for any abnormalities to the cranial and visceral skeleton. The removal of premigratory neural crest at the level of the anterior prosencephalon (zone I) and at the level of somites 6 to 8 (zone VII) had no effect on skeletal development. However, the extirpation of neural crest from the intervening regions was positively correlated with deletions/reductions to the trabeculae (basicranial elements) and to the branchial arches (viscerocranial elements). Alterations to the trabeculae (16/27 cases, or 59%) occurred only after extirpation of zones II-V (corresponding to the posterior prosencephalon to midrhombencephalon) while alterations to the branchial arches (21/28 cases, or 75%) occurred only after removal of neural crest from zones III-VI (corresponding to the mesencephalon to the level of the fifth somite). Furthermore, the first three branchial arches were correlated in a majority of cases with neural crest from zone III, the next two arches with zones IV, V and VI and the last two arches with zone VI. Organs that develop within or adjacent to the area of neural crest extirpation such as the brain, notochord and lateral mesodermal derivatives were not affected. Parachordals were never altered by the operations nor were there any discernible changes to developing mucocartilage or to the prechondrogenic otic capsule. The contributions of the neural crest to the petromyzonid head skeleton described herein are compared with the roles of neural crest in the development of cranial and visceral skeletal elements in other vertebrates. The importance of these findings to the current hypothesis of the phylogeny of the vertebrate skeleton and the central role of the neural crest in vertebrate cephalization is discussed.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. G. Ota and S. Kuratani Cyclostome embryology and early evolutionary history of vertebrates Integr. Comp. Biol., September 1, 2007; 47(3): 329 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. McCauley and M. Bronner-Fraser Neural crest contributions to the lamprey head Development, June 1, 2003; 130(11): 2317 - 2327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Meulemans and M. Bronner-Fraser Amphioxus and lamprey AP-2 genes: implications for neural crest evolution and migration patterns Development, January 11, 2002; 129(21): 4953 - 4962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Neidert, V. Virupannavar, G. W. Hooker, and J. A. Langeland Lamprey Dlx genes and early vertebrate evolution PNAS, February 13, 2001; 98(4): 1665 - 1670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y Suda, J Nakabayashi, I Matsuo, and S Aizawa Functional equivalency between Otx2 and Otx1 in development of the rostral head Development, January 2, 1999; 126(4): 743 - 757. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G Couly, A Grapin-Botton, P Coltey, and N. Le Douarin The regeneration of the cephalic neural crest, a problem revisited: the regenerating cells originate from the contralateral or from the anterior and posterior neural fold Development, January 11, 1996; 122(11): 3393 - 3407. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.C. Johnston and P.T. Bronsky Prenatal Craniofacial Development: New Insights On Normal and Abnormal Mechanisms Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 1, 1995; 6(1): 25 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.C. Johnston and P.T. Bronsky Prenatal Craniofacial Development: New Insights on Normal and Abnormal Mechanisms Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 1, 1995; 6(4): 368 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Schilling and C. Kimmel Segment and cell type lineage restrictions during pharyngeal arch development in the zebrafish embryo Development, January 3, 1994; 120(3): 483 - 494. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||