|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 103, Issue 1 171-178, Copyright © 1988 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
MA Surani, SC Barton, SK Howlett and ML Norris
Department of Molecular Embryology, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research, Cambridge, UK.
We have examined the role of germline-specific chromosomal determinants of development in the mouse. Studies were carried out using aggregation chimaeras between androgenetic----fertilized embryos and compared with similar parthenogenetic----fertilized chimaeras. Several adult chimaeras were found with parthenogenetic cells but none were found with androgenetic cells. Analysis of chimaeras at mid-gestation showed that parthenogenetic cells were detected in the embryo and yolk sac but that androgenetic cells were found only in the trophoblast and yolk sac and not in the embryo. The contribution of parthenogenetic cells to the embryo and yolk sac was increased by aggregating 2-cell parthenogenetic and 4-cell fertilized embryos but the contribution of parthenogenetic cells in extraembryonic tissues remained negligible even after aggregation of 4-cell parthenogenetic and 2-cell fertilized embryos. Furthermore, parthenogenetic cells were primarily found in the yolk sac mesoderm and not in the yolk sac endoderm. These results suggest that maternal chromosomes in parthenogenetic cells permit their participation in the primitive ectoderm lineage but these cells are presumably eliminated by selective pressure or autonomous cell lethality from the primitive endoderm and trophectoderm lineages. Conversely paternal chromosomes in androgenetic cells confer opposite properties since the embryonic cells can be detected in the trophoblast and the yolk sac but not in the embryos, presumably because they are eliminated from the primitive ectoderm lineage. The spatial distribution of cells with different parental chromosomes may occur partly because of differential expression of some genes, such as proto-oncogenes, and partly due to their ability to respond to a variety of diffusible growth factors.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K A Kaiser-Rogers, D E McFadden, C A Livasy, J Dansereau, R Jiang, J F Knops, L Lefebvre, K W Rao, and W P Robinson Androgenetic/biparental mosaicism causes placental mesenchymal dysplasia J. Med. Genet., February 1, 2006; 43(2): 187 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Devriendt Hydatidiform mole and triploidy: the role of genomic imprinting in placental development Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 137 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I Takahashi, G. Nuckolls, K Takahashi, O Tanaka, I Semba, R Dashner, L Shum, and H. Slavkin Compressive force promotes sox9, type II collagen and aggrecan and inhibits IL-1beta expression resulting in chondrogenesis in mouse embryonic limb bud mesenchymal cells J. Cell Sci., June 8, 2000; 111(14): 2067 - 2076. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Luukko, K. Sainio, H. Sariola, M. Saarma, and I. Thesleff Localization of Nerve Cells in the Developing Rat Tooth Journal of Dental Research, July 1, 1997; 76(7): 1350 - 1356. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H Sasaki, A. Ferguson-Smith, A. Shum, S. Barton, and M. Surani Temporal and spatial regulation of H19 imprinting in normal and uniparental mouse embryos Development, January 12, 1995; 121(12): 4195 - 4202. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y Kato and Y Tsunoda Germ cell nuclei of male fetal mice can support development of chimeras to midgestation following serial transplantation Development, January 3, 1995; 121(3): 779 - 783. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H Sasaki, P A Jones, J R Chaillet, A C Ferguson-Smith, S C Barton, W Reik, and M A Surani Parental imprinting: potentially active chromatin of the repressed maternal allele of the mouse insulin-like growth factor II (Igf2) gene. Genes & Dev., October 1, 1992; 6(10): 1843 - 1856. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Jagerbauer, A Fraser, E. Herbst, R Kothary, and R Fundele Parthenogenetic stem cells in postnatal mouse chimeras Development, January 9, 1992; 116(1): 95 - 102. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.H. Sperber Current Concepts in Embryonic Craniofacial Development Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 1, 1992; 4(1): 67 - 72. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J A Thomson and D Solter The developmental fate of androgenetic, parthenogenetic, and gynogenetic cells in chimeric gastrulating mouse embryos. Genes & Dev., October 1, 1988; 2(10): 1344 - 1351. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||