spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif ARCHIVE ANNOUNCEMENT! spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hardin, J.
Right arrow Articles by Keller, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hardin, J.
Right arrow Articles by Keller, R.

Development, Vol 103, Issue 1 211-230, Copyright © 1988 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

The behaviour and function of bottle cells during gastrulation of Xenopus laevis

J Hardin and R Keller
Biophysics and Medical Physics Group, University of California, Berkeley 94720.

The behaviour of bottle cells in normal and microsurgically altered gastrulae and in cultured explants of Xenopus laevis was analysed, using time-lapse micrography, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and cell tracing with fluorescein dextran amine (FDA). The results shed new light on the function of bottle cells. Bottle cells forming in vivo show a predominantly animal-vegetal apical contraction and a concurrent apical-basal elongation, whereas those forming in cultured explants show uniform apical contraction and remain rotund. Bottle cells forming in embryos with fewer subblastoporal cells contract more uniformly than those in normal embryos and release of normal bottle cells from supra- and subblastoporal cells results in immediate loss of the bottle shape. These results, and an analysis of the effects of bottle cell formation on the shapes and movements of surrounding tissues, show that unique shape of bottle cells and their probable function in development are not intrinsic properties but result from a modulation of the effect of a uniform and intrinsic apical contraction by the geometric and mechanical properties of the surrounding tissue. Mechanical simulations of bottle cell formation, using the finite element method, suggest how the site of bottle cell formation and the thickness and stiffness of adjacent tissues might change the effects of their formation. These results and FDA marking of prospective bottle cells and the adjacent deep mesodermal cells suggest that bottle cells function during their formation to initiate the involution of the prospective mesodermal mantle. Later they respread to deepen the archenteron and to form its peripheral wall.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
P. Skoglund, A. Rolo, X. Chen, B. M. Gumbiner, and R. Keller
Convergence and extension at gastrulation require a myosin IIB-dependent cortical actin network
Development, July 15, 2008; 135(14): 2435 - 2444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
E. M. del Pino, M. Venegas-Ferrin, A. Romero-Carvajal, P. Montenegro-Larrea, N. Saenz-Ponce, I. M. Moya, I. Alarcon, N. Sudou, S. Yamamoto, and M. Taira
Inaugural Article: A comparative analysis of frog early development
PNAS, July 17, 2007; 104(29): 11882 - 11888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
C. W. Larsen, E. Hirst, C. Alexandre, and J.-P. Vincent
Segment boundary formation in Drosophila embryos
Development, December 1, 2003; 130(23): 5625 - 5635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
J.-Y. Lee and B. Goldstein
Mechanisms of cell positioning during C. elegans gastrulation
Development, March 2, 2003; 130(2): 307 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
H Oda and S Tsukita
Real-time imaging of cell-cell adherens junctions reveals that Drosophila mesoderm invagination begins with two phases of apical constriction of cells
J. Cell Sci., January 2, 2001; 114(3): 493 - 501.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
H Weber, C. Symes, M. Walmsley, A. Rodaway, and R. Patient
A role for GATA5 in Xenopus endoderm specification
Development, January 10, 2000; 127(20): 4345 - 4360.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
M. Myat and D. Andrew
Organ shape in the Drosophila salivary gland is controlled by regulated, sequential internalization of the primordia
Development, January 2, 2000; 127(4): 679 - 691.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
K. Lustig, K. Kroll, E. Sun, and M. Kirschner
Expression cloning of a Xenopus T-related gene (Xombi) involved in mesodermal patterning and blastopore lip formation
Development, January 12, 1996; 122(12): 4001 - 4012.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
L. Davidson, M. Koehl, R Keller, and G. Oster
How do sea urchins invaginate? Using biomechanics to distinguish between mechanisms of primary invagination
Development, January 7, 1995; 121(7): 2005 - 2018.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
M Leptin and S Roth
Autonomy and non-autonomy in Drosophila mesoderm determination and morphogenesis
Development, January 4, 1994; 120(4): 853 - 859.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1988