QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Erickson, C. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Erickson, C. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Control of pathfinding by the avian trunk neural crest

Department of Zoology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA

SUMMARY

We have determined the pathways taken by the trunk neural crest of quail and examined the parameters that control these patterns of dispersion. Using antibodies that recognize migratory neural crest cells (HNK-1), we have found that the crest cells take three primary pathways: (1) between the ectoderm and somites, (2) within the intersomitic space and (3) through the anterior somite along the basal surface of the myotome.

The parameters controlling dispersion patterns of neural crest cells are several. The pathways are filled with at least two adhesive molecules, laminin and fibronectin, to which neural crest cells adhere tenaciously in culture. The pattern of migration through the somite may be accounted for in part by the precocious development of the basal lamina of the dermamyotome in the anterior half of the somite; this basal lamina contains both fibronectin and laminin and the neural crest cells prefer to migrate on it. In contrast, the regions into which the crest cells do not invade are filled with relatively nonadhesive molecules such as chondroitin sulphate. Some of the pathways are filled with hyaluronic acid, which stimulates the migration of neural crest cells when they are cultured in three-dimensional gels, presumably by opening spaces. Neural crest cells are also constrained to stay within the pathways by basal laminae, which act as barriers and through which crest cells do not go. Therefore, crest pathways are probably defined by several redundant factors.

The directionality of crest cell migration is probably due to contact inhibition, which can be demonstrated in tissue culture. Various grafting experiments have suggested that chemotaxis and haptotaxis do not play a role in controlling the dispersion of the crest cells away from the neural tube.

We have documented the extraordinary ability of neural crest cells to disperse in the embryo, even when they are grafted into sites in which they would normally not migrate. We have evidence that the cells' production of plasminogen activator, a proteolytic enzyme, and also the minimal tractional force that crest cells exert on the substratum as they migrate, contribute to this migratory ability.

Key words: neural crest, pathfinding, extracellular matrix, chemotaxis, haptotaxis, galvanotaxis

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T Lallier, G Leblanc, K. Artinger, and M Bronner-Fraser Cranial and trunk neural crest cells use different mechanisms for attachment to extracellular matrices Development, January 11, 1992; 116(3): 531 - 541. [Abstract] [PDF]