|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 107, Issue 2 299-307, Copyright © 1989 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
L Stephens, T Kitajima and F Wilt
Department of Zoology, University of California, Berkeley 94720.
The effects of disrupting cell interactions in early development were investigated by examining the accumulation of a primary mesenchyme specific transcript (SM50) and an aboral ectoderm-specific transcript (Spec 1) in cultures of sea urchin embryos that were dissociated at early stages and then cultured in CFSW. The expression of both SM50 and Spec 1 is temporally correct and remains restricted to the appropriate cell types, even if the embryo is dissociated as early as the 2-cell stage and maintained as a suspension of single cells. This result is consistent with the idea that the specificity of expression of these two genes, each characteristic of different lineages, is strongly regulated by information in the egg. Average SM50 expression is half that of intact embryos, but Spec 1 expression is very low, only 10-20% of intact controls, suggesting some differences in the response of the two genes to lack of close cell interactions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. A. Ettensohn, C. Kitazawa, M. S. Cheers, J. D. Leonard, and T. Sharma Gene regulatory networks and developmental plasticity in the early sea urchin embryo: alternative deployment of the skeletogenic gene regulatory network Development, September 1, 2007; 134(17): 3077 - 3087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Davidson, R. Cameron, and A Ransick Specification of cell fate in the sea urchin embryo: summary and some proposed mechanisms Development, January 9, 1998; 125(17): 3269 - 3290. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Wikramanayake, B. Brandhorst, and W. Klein Autonomous and non-autonomous differentiation of ectoderm in different sea urchin species Development, January 5, 1995; 121(5): 1497 - 1505. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
