spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fontaine-Perus, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Rothman, T. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fontaine-Perus, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Rothman, T. P.

Development, Vol 107, Issue 3 413-422, Copyright © 1989 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Mitogenic effect of muscle on the neuroepithelium of the developing spinal cord

JC Fontaine-Perus, M Chanconie, NM Le Douarin, MD Gershon and TP Rothman
Universite de Nantes, CNRS URA 1340, Faculte des Sciences, France.

A previous study revealed that segments of bowel grafted between the neural tube and somites of a younger chick host embryo would induce a unilateral increase in cellularity of the host's neural tube. The current experiments were done to test the hypotheses that muscle tissue in the wall of the gut is responsible for this growth-promoting effect and that the spinal cord enlargement is the result of a mitogenic action on the neuroepithelium. Fragments of skeletal (E8-15) or cardiac muscle (E4-14) were removed from quail embryos and grafted between the neural tube and somites of chick host embryos (E2). Both skeletal and cardiac muscle grafts mimicked the effect of bowel and induced an increase in cell number as well as a unilateral enlargement of the region of the host's neural tube immediately adjacent to the grafts. The growth-promoting effect of muscle-containing grafts was restricted to the neural tube itself and was not seen in proximate dorsal root or sympathetic ganglia. The action of the grafts of muscle was neither species- nor class-specific, since enlargement of the neural tube was observed following implantation of fetal mouse skeletal muscle into quail hosts. Grafts of skeletal muscle or gut increased the number of cells taking up [3H]thymidine in the host's neuroepithelium as early as 9 h following implantation of a graft. The increase in the number of cells entering the S phase of the cell cycle preceded the increase in cell number. These observations demonstrate that muscle-containing tissues can increase the rate of proliferation of neuroepithelial cells when these tissues are experimentally placed together.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
H. B. Samat and J. H. Menkes
How to Construct a Neural Tube
J Child Neurol, February 1, 2000; 15(2): 110 - 124.
[PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
A. Borycki, B Brunk, S Tajbakhsh, M Buckingham, C Chiang, and C. Emerson
Sonic hedgehog controls epaxial muscle determination through Myf5 activation
Development, January 9, 1999; 126(18): 4053 - 4063.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1989