spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif ARCHIVE ANNOUNCEMENT! spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Charlebois, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Grainger, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Charlebois, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Grainger, R. M.

Development, Vol 108, Issue 1 33-45, Copyright © 1990 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Isolation of a chick cytokeratin cDNA clone indicative of regional specialization in early embryonic ectoderm

TS Charlebois, DH Spencer, SK Tarkington, JJ Henry and RM Grainger
Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville 22901.

During early vertebrate development, a series of inductive tissue interactions appear to be involved in establishing regional specializations that are eventually elaborated in the basic body plan of the embryo. These early inductive interactions are particularly difficult to study because they often occur in the absence of any associated morphological changes. In the chick embryo, the regional subdivision of the early ectoderm is evidenced by a marked lens-forming bias in the head ectoderm, which is absent from the presumptive dorsal epidermis of the trunk region. This striking divergence in developmental state is present long before any differentiation into lens or epidermal phenotypes can be detected. As a strategy for isolating genes whose differential expression might be a reflection of this regional subdivision, a cDNA library was prepared from early embryos and screened for differential hybridization to radiolabelled probes prepared from head ectoderm and trunk ectoderm. Two related cDNA clones were isolated that hybridize to transcripts present at much higher levels in trunk ectoderm than in head ectoderm. Sequence analysis of one of these clones revealed a high degree of similarity to members of the type II subfamily of intermediate filament cytokeratins. This clone (pCKse1) was used to examine cytokeratin gene expression in ectodermal tissues. A large increase in the level of CKse1 transcripts was found to take place in trunk ectoderm, approximately coordinate with neurulation, contrasting sharply with the much lower levels detected in head ectoderm and neural ectoderm at all stages tested. These results indicate that differential cytokeratin gene expression can occur within a contiguous layer of simple embryonic epithelia, and that this expression pattern coincides closely to the subdivision of the early ectoderm into regions with distinct developmental potencies. This type of regulation has not been described previously for members of the cytokeratin gene family.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Heller, C. A. Sheane, Z. Javed, and A. J. Hudspeth
Molecular markers for cell types of the inner ear and candidate genes for hearing disorders
PNAS, September 15, 1998; 95(19): 11400 - 11405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
A Tonegawa, N Funayama, N Ueno, and Y Takahashi
Mesodermal subdivision along the mediolateral axis in chicken controlled by different concentrations of BMP-4
Development, January 5, 1997; 124(10): 1975 - 1984.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
M. Goulding, A Lumsden, and P Gruss
Signals from the notochord and floor plate regulate the region-specific expression of two Pax genes in the developing spinal cord
Development, January 3, 1993; 117(3): 1001 - 1016.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1990