|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 110, Issue 3 927-932, Copyright © 1990 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
P Simpson and C Carteret
Laboratoire de Genetique Moleculaire des Eucaryotes du CNRS, Unite 184 de Biologie Moleculaire et de Genie Genetique de l'INSERM, Faculte de Medecine, Strasbourg, France.
The segregation of neural precursors from epidermal cells during development of the nervous system of Drosophila relies on interactions between cells that are thought to be initially equivalent. During development of the adult peripheral nervous system, failure of the cellular interactions leads to the differentiation of a tuft of sensory bristles at the site where usually only one develops. It is thus thought that a group of cells at that site (a proneural cluster) has the potential to make a bristle but that in normal development only one cell will do so. The question addressed here is do these cells constitute an equivalence group (Kimble, J., Sulston, J. and White, J. (1979). In Cell Lineage, Stem Cells and Cell Determination (ed. N. Le Douarin). Inserm Symposium No. 10 pp. 59-68, Elsevier, Amsterdam)? Within clusters mutant for shaggy, where several cells of a cluster follow the neural fate and differentiate bristles, it is shown that these display identical neuronal specificity: stimulation of the bristles evoke the same leg cleaning response and backfilling of single neurons reveal similar axonal projections in the central nervous system. This provides direct experimental evidence that the cells of a proneural cluster are developmentally equivalent.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. M. Escudero, S.-Y. Wei, W.-H. Chiu, J. Modolell, and J.-C. Hsu Echinoid synergizes with the Notch signaling pathway in Drosophila mesothorax bristle patterning Development, December 22, 2003; 130(25): 6305 - 6316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Chambers, Y Peng, H Nguyen, N Gaiano, G Fishell, and J. Nye Spatiotemporal selectivity of response to Notch1 signals in mammalian forebrain precursors Development, January 3, 2001; 128(5): 689 - 702. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Austin, D. Feldman, J. Ida, and C. Cepko Vertebrate retinal ganglion cells are selected from competent progenitors by the action of Notch Development, January 11, 1995; 121(11): 3637 - 3650. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Lieber, S Kidd, E Alcamo, V Corbin, and M W Young Antineurogenic phenotypes induced by truncated Notch proteins indicate a role in signal transduction and may point to a novel function for Notch in nuclei. Genes & Dev., October 1, 1993; 7(10): 1949 - 1965. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Heitzler and P Simpson Altered epidermal growth factor-like sequences provide evidence for a role of Notch as a receptor in cell fate decisions Development, January 3, 1993; 117(3): 1113 - 1123. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E Giniger, L. Jan, and Y. Jan Specifying the path of the intersegmental nerve of the Drosophila embryo: a role for Delta and Notch Development, January 2, 1993; 117(2): 431 - 440. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Simpson, M. Bourouis, P. Heitzler, L. Ruel, M. Haenlin, and P. Ramain Delta, Notch, and shaggy: Elements of a Lateral Signaling Pathway in Drosophila Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 1992; 57(0): 391 - 400. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||