spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gooday, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gooday, D. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Development, Vol 113, Issue 2 409-417, Copyright © 1991 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Xenopus temporal retinal neurites collapse on contact with glial cells from caudal tectum in vitro

AR Johnston and DJ Gooday
MRC Neural Development and Regeneration Group, University of Edinburgh, Scotland.

Nasal and temporal retinal neurites were confronted in culture with glial cells from the rostral and caudal parts of the optic tectum and with glial cells from the diencephalon. Twenty of each of the six classes of encounter between individual growth cones and isolated glial cells were analysed by time-lapse videorecording. The results show that growth cones from the temporal retina collapse when they contact glial cells from the caudal tectum, but do not collapse when they contact glia from other areas. Growth cones of nasal retinal fibres do not collapse on contact with any of the glial types examined. This suggests that the inhibitory phenomena described by others are in part due to the cell surface characteristics of glial cells, and that there are differences between glia from the front and back of the optic tectum.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Ichijo and F. Bonhoeffer
Differential Withdrawal of Retinal Axons Induced by a Secreted Factor
J. Neurosci., July 1, 1998; 18(13): 5008 - 5018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
R. W. Davenport, E. Thies, R. Zhou, and P. G. Nelson
Cellular Localization of Ephrin-A2, Ephrin-A5, and Other Functional Guidance Cues Underlies Retinotopic Development across Species
J. Neurosci., February 1, 1998; 18(3): 975 - 986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ScienceHome page
A. Roskies and D. O'Leary
Control of topographic retinal axon branching by inhibitory membrane-bound molecules
Science, August 5, 1994; 265(5173): 799 - 803.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 DevelopmentHome page
B Poeck, A Hofbauer, and G. Pflugfelder
Expression of the Drosophila optomotor-blind gene transcript in neuronal and glial cells of the developing nervous system
Development, January 3, 1993; 117(3): 1017 - 1029.
[Abstract] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1991