|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 113, Issue 2 561-568, Copyright © 1991 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
KE Latham and D Solter
Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Analysis of the developmental capacities of androgenetic and gynogenetic mouse embryos (bearing two paternal or two maternal pronuclei, respectively) revealed a defect in blastocyst formation of androgenetic, but not gynogenetic, embryos that was a function of the maternal genotype. Androgenetic embryos constructed using fertilized eggs from C57BL/6 or (B6D2)F1 mice developed to the blastocyst stage at frequencies similar to those previously reported, whereas androgenetic embryos constructed with fertilized eggs from DBA/2 mice developed poorly, the majority failing to progress beyond the 16-cell stage and unable to form a blastocoel-like cavity, regardless of whether the male pronuclei were of C57BL6 or DBA/2 origin. This impaired development was observed even in androgenetic embryos constructed by transplanting two male pronuclei from fertilized DBA/2 eggs to enucleated C57BL/6 eggs, indicating that the defect cannot be explained as the lack of some essential component in the DBA/2 cytoplasm that might otherwise compensate for androgeny. Rather, the DBA/2 egg cytoplasm apparently modifies the incoming male pronuclei differently than does C57BL/6 egg cytoplasm. Several specific alterations in the protein synthesis pattern of DBA/2 androgenones were observed that reflect a defect in the regulatory mechanisms that normally modulate the synthesis of these proteins between the 8-cell and blastocyst stages. These results are consistent with a model in which cytoplasmic factors present in the egg direct a strain-dependent modification of paternal genome function in response to epigenetic modifications (genomic imprinting) established during gametogenesis and indicate that preimplantation development can be affected by these modifications at both the morphological and biochemical levels.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C.-G. Liang, Z. Han, Y. Cheng, Z. Zhong, and K. E. Latham Effects of ooplasm transfer on paternal genome function in mice Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2009; 24(11): 2718 - 2728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Cheng, K. Wang, L. D. Kellam, Y. S. Lee, C.-G. Liang, Z. Han, N. R. Mtango, and K. E. Latham Effects of Ooplasm Manipulation on DNA Methylation and Growth of Progeny in Mice Biol Reprod, March 1, 2009; 80(3): 464 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. R Mtango and K. E Latham Differential Expression of Cell Cycle Genes in Rhesus Monkey Oocytes and Embryos of Different Developmental Potentials Biol Reprod, February 1, 2008; 78(2): 254 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Y. Ideraabdullah, K. Kim, D. Pomp, J. L. Moran, D. Beier, and F. P.-M. d. Villena Rescue of the Mouse DDK Syndrome by Parent-of-Origin-Dependent Modifiers Biol Reprod, February 1, 2007; 76(2): 286 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. Han, Y. G. Chung, S. Gao, and K. E. Latham Maternal Factors Controlling Blastomere Fragmentation in Early Mouse Embryos Biol Reprod, March 1, 2005; 72(3): 612 - 618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Gao, G. Wu, Z. Han, E. de la Casa-Esperon, C. Sapienza, and K. E. Latham Recapitulation of the Ovum Mutant (Om) Phenotype and Loss of Om Locus Polarity in Cloned Mouse Embryos Biol Reprod, February 1, 2005; 72(2): 487 - 491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Ibanez, D. F Albertini, and E. W Overstrom Effect of genetic background and activating stimulus on the timing of meiotic cell cycle progression in parthenogenetically activated mouse oocytes Reproduction, January 1, 2005; 129(1): 27 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Gao, E. Czirr, Y. G. Chung, Z. Han, and K. E. Latham Genetic Variation in Oocyte Phenotype Revealed Through Parthenogenesis and Cloning: Correlation with Differences in Pronuclear Epigenetic Modification Biol Reprod, April 1, 2004; 70(4): 1162 - 1170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Lagutina, G. Lazzari, R. Duchi, and C. Galli Developmental Potential of Bovine Androgenetic and Parthenogenetic Embryos: A Comparative Study Biol Reprod, February 1, 2004; 70(2): 400 - 405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. E. Latham, H. Akutsu, B. Patel, and R. Yanagimachi Comparison of Gene Expression During Preimplantation Development Between Diploid and Haploid Mouse Embryos Biol Reprod, August 1, 2002; 67(2): 386 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Hawes, C. Sapienza, and K. E. Latham Ooplasmic donation in humans: The potential for epigenic modifications Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2002; 17(4): 850 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. G. Chung, M. R.W. Mann, M. S. Bartolomei, and K. E. Latham Nuclear-Cytoplasmic "Tug of War" During Cloning: Effects of Somatic Cell Nuclei on Culture Medium Preferences of Preimplantation Cloned Mouse Embryos Biol Reprod, April 1, 2002; 66(4): 1178 - 1184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Hawes, Y. Gie Chung, and K. E. Latham Genetic and Epigenetic Factors Affecting Blastomere Fragmentation in Two-Cell Stage Mouse Embryos Biol Reprod, October 1, 2001; 65(4): 1050 - 1056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Khosla, W. Dean, D. Brown, W. Reik, and R. Feil Culture of Preimplantation Mouse Embryos Affects Fetal Development and the Expression of Imprinted Genes Biol Reprod, March 1, 2001; 64(3): 918 - 926. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. E. Latham, B. Patel, F. D. M. Bautista, and S. M. Hawes Effects of X Chromosome Number and Parental Origin on X-Linked Gene Expression in Preimplantation Mouse Embryos Biol Reprod, July 1, 2000; 63(1): 64 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. S. Doherty, M. R.W. Mann, K. D. Tremblay, M. S. Bartolomei, and R. M. Schultz Differential Effects of Culture on Imprinted H19 Expression in the Preimplantation Mouse Embryo Biol Reprod, June 1, 2000; 62(6): 1526 - 1535. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Obata, Y. Ono, H. Akuzawa, O.Y. Kwon, M. Yoshizawa, and T. Kono Post-implantation development of mouse androgenetic embryos produced by in-vitro fertilization of enucleated oocytes Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2000; 15(4): 874 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Kato, A. Yabuuchi, N. Motosugi, J.-y. Kato, and Y. Tsunoda Developmental Potential of Mouse Follicular Epithelial Cells and Cumulus Cells After Nuclear Transfer Biol Reprod, October 1, 1999; 61(4): 1110 - 1114. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. E. Latham, F. D. M. Bautista, Y. Hirao, M. J. O'Brien, and J. J. Eppig Comparison of Protein Synthesis Patterns in Mouse Cumulus Cells and Mural Granulosa Cells: Effects of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and Insulin on Granulosa Cell Differentiation In Vitro Biol Reprod, August 1, 1999; 61(2): 482 - 492. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Latham and C Sapienza Localization of genes encoding egg modifiers of paternal genome function to mouse chromosomes one and two Development, January 3, 1998; 125(5): 929 - 935. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J R Chaillet, D S Bader, and P Leder Regulation of genomic imprinting by gametic and embryonic processes. Genes & Dev., May 15, 1995; 9(10): 1177 - 1187. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K E Latham, A S Doherty, C D Scott, and R M Schultz Igf2r and Igf2 gene expression in androgenetic, gynogenetic, and parthenogenetic preimplantation mouse embryos: absence of regulation by genomic imprinting. Genes & Dev., February 1, 1994; 8(3): 290 - 299. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Latham Strain-specific differences in mouse oocytes and their contributions to epigenetic inheritance Development, January 12, 1994; 120(12): 3419 - 3426. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Renard, P Baldacci, V Richoux-Duranthon, S Pournin, and C Babinet A maternal factor affecting mouse blastocyst formation Development, January 4, 1994; 120(4): 797 - 802. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Reik, I. Romer, S. C. Barton, M. A. Surani, S. K. Howlett, and J. Klose Adult phenotype in the mouse can be affected by epigenetic events in the early embryo Development, November 1, 1993; 119(3): 933 - 942. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L L Carlson, A W Page, and T H Bestor Properties and localization of DNA methyltransferase in preimplantation mouse embryos: implications for genomic imprinting. Genes & Dev., December 1, 1992; 6(12b): 2536 - 2541. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Schumacher, P. A. Koetsier, J. Hertz, and W. Doerfler Epigenetic and Genotype-specific Effects on the Stability of de Novo Imposed Methylation Patterns in Transgenic Mice J. Biol. Chem., November 22, 2000; 275(48): 37915 - 37921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
