|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 113, Issue 2 661-669, Copyright © 1991 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
JM Slack
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, UK.
A transfilter apparatus is described, which is suitable for neutralization experiments on embryonic induction, and it is used to investigate the sensitivity of the Xenopus mesoderm-inducing signal to various inhibitors. The vegetal (inducing) tissue is placed on one side of a membrane sandwich and the animal (responding) tissue on the other side. The sandwich consists of a nylon gauze in between two Nucleopore filters and enables inhibitors in the solution to have effective access to the gap between the tissues. Control experiments show a high proportion of positive inductions of a ventral character. Using this apparatus, it is shown that the protein follistatin, which effectively inhibits activin A and B in vitro, has little or no effect on the natural signal. Likewise, antibodies to basic fibroblast growth factor, which inhibit in vitro, do not inhibit the natural signal. The two inhibitors together have a slight effect. It is concluded that neither activin nor bFGF are major components of the signal emitted by the vegetal cells of the Xenopus blastula and transmitted across the liquid gap, although they might have some other role to play in the process. Two agents of lower specificity do inhibit the transfilter induction: heparin and suramin. Suramin will also inhibit induction in animal-vegetal combinations with no intervening membranes while heparin does not. This suggests that the heparin inhibition can only occur when there is a liquid gap between the tissues, presumably because it can neutralize the signal in solution but cannot penetrate the explants themselves. The endogenous mesoderm-inducing factor(s) should therefore be sensitive to heparin in vitro.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. Spears, S. Baker, V. Srsen, R. Lapping, J. Mullan, R. Nelson, and V. Allison Mouse Ovarian Follicles Secrete Factors Affecting the Growth and Development of Like-Sized Ovarian Follicles In Vitro Biol Reprod, December 1, 2002; 67(6): 1726 - 1733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E Agius, M Oelgeschlager, O Wessely, C Kemp, and E. De Robertis Endodermal Nodal-related signals and mesoderm induction in Xenopus Development, January 3, 2000; 127(6): 1173 - 1183. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Clements, R. Friday, and H. Woodland Mode of action of VegT in mesoderm and endoderm formation Development, January 11, 1999; 126(21): 4903 - 4911. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Horb and G. Thomsen A vegetally localized T-box transcription factor in Xenopus eggs specifies mesoderm and endoderm and is essential for embryonic mesoderm formation Development, January 5, 1997; 124(9): 1689 - 1698. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Kessler and D. Melton Induction of dorsal mesoderm by soluble, mature Vg1 protein Development, January 7, 1995; 121(7): 2155 - 2164. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Kessler and D. Melton Vertebrate embryonic induction: mesodermal and neural patterning Science, October 28, 1994; 266(5185): 596 - 604. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Sokol Mesoderm formation in Xenopus ectodermal explants overexpressing Xwnt8: evidence for a cooperating signal reaching the animal pole by gastrulation Development, January 8, 1993; 118(4): 1335 - 1342. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Maslanski, L Leshko, and W. Busa Lithium-sensitive production of inositol phosphates during amphibian embryonic mesoderm induction Science, April 10, 1992; 256(5054): 243 - 245. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Umbhauer, J. Riou, J Spring, J. Smith, and J. Boucaut Expression of tenascin mRNA in mesoderm during Xenopus laevis embryogenesis: the potential role of mesoderm patterning in tenascin regionalization Development, January 9, 1992; 116(1): 147 - 157. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
