|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 116, Issue 4 841-854, Copyright © 1992 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
ML Lamka, AM Boulet and S Sakonju
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84112.
The Abdominal-B (Abd-B) gene, a member of the bithorax complex (BX-C), specifies the identities of parasegments (PS) 10-14 in Drosophila. Abd-B codes for two structurally related homeodomain proteins, ABD-B m and ABD-B r, that are expressed in PS10-13 and PS14-15, respectively. Although ABD-B m and r proteins have distinct developmental functions, ectopic expression of either protein during embryogenesis induces the development of filzkorper and associated spiracular hairs, structures normally located in PS13, at ectopic sites in the larval thorax and abdomen. These results suggest that other parasegmental differences contribute to the phenotype specified by ABD-B r activity in PS14. Both ABD-B m and r repress the expression of other homeotic genes, such as Ubx and abd-A, in PS10-14. However, the importance of these and other cross-regulatory interactions among homeotic genes has been questioned. Since ectopic UBX protein apparently failed to transform abdominal segments, Gonzalez-Reyes et al. (Gonzalez-Reyes, A., Urquia, N., Gehring, W.J., Struhl, G. and Morata, G. (1990). Nature 344, 78-80) proposed a functional hierarchy in which ABD-A and ABD-B activities override UBX activity. We tested this model by expressing UBX and ABD-B m proteins ectopically in wild-type and BX-C-deficient embryos. Ectopic ABD-B m does not prevent transformations induced by ectopic UBX. Instead, ectopic UBX and ABD-B m proteins compete for the specification of segmental identities in a dose-dependent fashion. Our results support a quantitative competition among the homeotic proteins rather than the existence of a strict functional hierarchy. Therefore, we suggest that cross-regulatory interactions are not irrelevant but are important for repressing the expression of competing homeotic proteins. To explain the apparent failure of ectopic UBX to transform the abdominal segments, we expressed UBX at different times during embryonic development. Our results show that ectopic UBX affects abdominal cuticular identities if expressed during early stages of embryogenesis. In later embryonic stages, abdominal segments become resistant to transformation by ectopic UBX while thoracic segments remain susceptible. Head segments also show a similar stage-dependent susceptibility to transformation by ectopic UBX in early embryogenesis but become resistant in later stages. These results suggest that abdominal and head identities are determined earlier than are thoracic identities.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. A. LaRonde-LeBlanc and C. Wolberger Structure of HoxA9 and Pbx1 bound to DNA: Hox hexapeptide and DNA recognition anterior to posterior Genes & Dev., August 15, 2003; 17(16): 2060 - 2072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Busturia, A. Lloyd, F. Bejarano, M. Zavortink, H. Xin, and S. Sakonju The MCP silencer of the Drosophila Abd-B gene requires both Pleiohomeotic and GAGA factor for the maintenance of repression Development, June 1, 2001; 128(11): 2163 - 2173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Hong, R. C. Lee, and V. Ambros Structure and Function Analysis of LIN-14, a Temporal Regulator of Postembryonic Developmental Events in Caenorhabditis elegans Mol. Cell. Biol., March 15, 2000; 20(6): 2285 - 2295. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q. Li, T. Pazdera, and J. Minden Drosophila embryonic pattern repair: how embryos respond to cyclin E-induced ectopic division Development, January 5, 1999; 126(10): 2299 - 2307. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Capovilla and J Botas Functional dominance among Hox genes: repression dominates activation in the regulation of Dpp Development, January 12, 1998; 125(24): 4949 - 4957. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L Jaffe, H D Ryoo, and R S Mann A role for phosphorylation by casein kinase II in modulating Antennapedia activity in Drosophila. Genes & Dev., May 15, 1997; 11(10): 1327 - 1340. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Yip, M. Lamka, and H. Lipshitz Control of germ-band retraction in Drosophila by the zinc-finger protein HINDSIGHT Development, January 6, 1997; 124(11): 2129 - 2141. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Baehrecke who encodes a KH RNA binding protein that functions in muscle development Development, January 4, 1997; 124(7): 1323 - 1332. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R Namba, T. Pazdera, R. Cerrone, and J. Minden Drosophila embryonic pattern repair: how embryos respond to bicoid dosage alteration Development, January 4, 1997; 124(7): 1393 - 1403. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D LaJeunesse and A Shearn E(z): a polycomb group gene or a trithorax group gene? Development, July 1, 1996; 122(7): 2189 - 2197. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Zhu and M. Kuziora Functional domains in the Deformed protein Development, January 5, 1996; 122(5): 1577 - 1587. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Boyle and S DiNardo Specification, migration and assembly of the somatic cells of the Drosophila gonad Development, January 6, 1995; 121(6): 1815 - 1825. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F Casares and E Sanchez-Herrero Regulation of the infraabdominal regions of the bithorax complex of Drosophila by gap genes Development, January 6, 1995; 121(6): 1855 - 1866. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Walter, C A Dever, and M D Biggin Two homeo domain proteins bind with similar specificity to a wide range of DNA sites in Drosophila embryos. Genes & Dev., July 15, 1994; 8(14): 1678 - 1692. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Mann Engrailed-mediated repression of Ultrabithorax is necessary for the parasegment 6 identity in Drosophila Development, January 11, 1994; 120(11): 3205 - 3212. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Castelli-Gair, S Greig, G Micklem, and M Akam Dissecting the temporal requirements for homeotic gene function Development, January 7, 1994; 120(7): 1983 - 1995. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Michelson Muscle pattern diversification in Drosophila is determined by the autonomous function of homeotic genes in the embryonic mesoderm Development, January 4, 1994; 120(4): 755 - 768. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S J Salser, C M Loer, and C Kenyon Multiple HOM-C gene interactions specify cell fates in the nematode central nervous system. Genes & Dev., September 1, 1993; 7(9): 1714 - 1724. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
