spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Purcell, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Keller, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Purcell, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Keller, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Development, Vol 117, Issue 1 307-317, Copyright © 1993 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

A different type of amphibian mesoderm morphogenesis in Ceratophrys ornata

SM Purcell and R Keller
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley 94720.

Ceratophrys ornata, the Argentinean horned frog, has a significantly different pattern of early morphogenesis than does the most studied amphibian, Xenopus laevis. Time-lapse videomicroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, histological sections and lineage tracers have shown that, in C. ornata, some prospective notochord, somite and tailbud mesoderm cells leave the surface epithelium of the archenteron by ingression. After gastrulation, SEM reveals cells with constricted apices and a bottle shape in three zones on the archenteron roof and in a fourth zone around the blastopore. Prospective somitic tissue ingresses first from two lateral zones, followed by ingression of prospective notochord from the medial zone and tailbud mesoderm from the circumblastoporal zone. This is unlike X. laevis, in which no cells with constricted apices are present on the dorsal surface of the archenteron, nor do any cells ingress into the deep mesodermal layers from the surface layer.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
R. Keller and D. Shook
Dynamic determinations: patterning the cell behaviours that close the amphibian blastopore
Phil Trans R Soc B, April 12, 2008; 363(1495): 1317 - 1332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
A. J. Ewald, S. M. Peyrot, J. M. Tyszka, S. E. Fraser, and J. B. Wallingford
Regional requirements for Dishevelled signaling during Xenopus gastrulation: separable effects on blastopore closure, mesendoderm internalization and archenteron formation
Development, December 15, 2004; 131(24): 6195 - 6209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
J. A. Bolker
Modularity in Development and Why It Matters to Evo-Devo
Integr. Comp. Biol., October 1, 2000; 40(5): 770 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
R. Warga and C Nusslein-Volhard
Origin and development of the zebrafish endoderm
Development, January 2, 1999; 126(4): 827 - 838.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
J Shih and S. Fraser
Distribution of tissue progenitors within the shield region of the zebrafish gastrula
Development, January 9, 1995; 121(9): 2755 - 2765.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1993