|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 118, Issue 4 1267-1277, Copyright © 1993 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
B Goldstein
Zoology Department, University of Texas, Austin 78712.
The gut of C. elegans derives from all the progeny of the E blastomere, a cell of the eight cell stage. Previous work has shown that gut specification requires an induction during the four cell stage (Goldstein, B. (1992) Nature 357, 255-257). Blastomere isolation and recombination experiments were done to determine which parts of the embryo can respond to gut induction. Normally only the posterior side of the EMS blastomere contacts the inducing cell, P2. When P2 was instead placed in a random position on an isolated EMS, gut consistently differentiated from the daughter of EMS contacting P2, indicating that any side of EMS can respond to gut induction. Additionally, moving P2 around to the opposite side of EMS in an otherwise intact embryo caused EMS's two daughter cells to switch lineage timings, and gut to differentiate from the descendents of what normally would be the MS blastomere. The other cells of the four cell stage, ABa, ABp, and P2, did not form gut when placed in contact with the inducer. To determine whether any other inductions are involved in gut specification, timed blastomere isolations were done at the two and eight cell stages. In the absence of cell contact at the two cell stage, segregation of gut fate proceeded normally at both the two and four cell stages. Gut fate also segregated properly in the absence of cell contact at the eight cell stage. A model is presented for the roles of lineage-dependent mechanisms and cell interactions in establishing gut fate in the E lineage.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. Zhang, A. R. Skop, and J. G. White Src and Wnt signaling regulate dynactin accumulation to the P2-EMS cell border in C. elegans embryos J. Cell Sci., January 15, 2008; 121(2): 155 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. J. Kim, G. Kumano, and H. Nishida Cell fate polarization in ascidian mesenchyme/muscle precursors by directed FGF signaling and role for an additional ectodermal FGF antagonizing signal in notochord/nerve cord precursors Development, April 15, 2007; 134(8): 1509 - 1518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Nakamura, S. Kim, T. Ishidate, Y. Bei, K. Pang, M. Shirayama, C. Trzepacz, D. R. Brownell, and C. C. Mello Wnt signaling drives WRM-1/{beta}-catenin asymmetries in early C. elegans embryos Genes & Dev., August 1, 2005; 19(15): 1749 - 1754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. D. Park and J. R. Priess Establishment of POP-1 asymmetry in early C. elegans embryos Development, August 1, 2003; 130(15): 3547 - 3556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Pichler, P. Gonczy, H. Schnabel, A. Pozniakowski, A. Ashford, R. Schnabel, and A. A. Hyman OOC-3, a novel putative transmembrane protein required for establishment of cortical domains and spindle orientation in the P(1) blastomere of C. elegans embryos Development, May 15, 2000; 127(10): 2063 - 2073. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Whangbo, J Harris, and C Kenyon Multiple levels of regulation specify the polarity of an asymmetric cell division in C. elegans Development, January 11, 2000; 127(21): 4587 - 4598. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Schlesinger, C. A. Shelton, J. N. Maloof, M. Meneghini, and B. Bowerman Wnt pathway components orient a mitotic spindle in the early Caenorhabditis elegans embryo without requiring gene transcription in the responding cell Genes & Dev., August 1, 1999; 13(15): 2028 - 2038. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Hawkins and G. Garriga Asymmetric cell division: from A to Z Genes & Dev., December 1, 1998; 12(23): 3625 - 3638. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Schroeder and J. McGhee Anterior-posterior patterning within the Caenorhabditis elegans endoderm Development, January 12, 1998; 125(24): 4877 - 4887. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Sweet Specification of first quartet micromeres in Ilyanassa involves inherited factors and position with respect to the inducing D macromere Development, January 10, 1998; 125(20): 4033 - 4044. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Rose and K Kemphues The let-99 gene is required for proper spindle orientation during cleavage of the C. elegans embryo Development, January 4, 1998; 125(7): 1337 - 1346. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Zhu, R. J. Hill, P. J. Heid, M. Fukuyama, A. Sugimoto, J. R. Priess, and J. H. Rothman end-1 encodes an apparent GATA factor that specifies the endoderm precursor in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos Genes & Dev., November 1, 1997; 11(21): 2883 - 2896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C Wittmann, O Bossinger, B Goldstein, M Fleischmann, R Kohler, K Brunschwig, H Tobler, and F Muller The expression of the C. elegans labial-like Hox gene ceh-13 during early embryogenesis relies on cell fate and on anteroposterior cell polarity Development, January 11, 1997; 124(21): 4193 - 4200. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R Schnabel Duels without obvious sense: counteracting inductions involved in body wall muscle development in the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo Development, January 7, 1995; 121(7): 2219 - 2232. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H Hutter and R Schnabel Specification of anterior-posterior differences within the AB lineage in the C. elegans embryo: a polarising induction Development, January 5, 1995; 121(5): 1559 - 1568. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B Goldstein An analysis of the response to gut induction in the C. elegans embryo Development, January 4, 1995; 121(4): 1227 - 1236. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Moskowitz, S. Gendreau, and J. Rothman Combinatorial specification of blastomere identity by glp-1-dependent cellular interactions in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans Development, January 11, 1994; 120(11): 3325 - 3338. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H Hutter and R Schnabel glp-1 and inductions establishing embryonic axes in C. elegans Development, January 7, 1994; 120(7): 2051 - 2064. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
