|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 119, Issue 2 353-361, Copyright © 1993 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
ML Poulin, KM Patrie, MJ Botelho, RA Tassava and IM Chiu
Department of Molecular Genetics, Ohio State University, Davis Medical Research Center, Columbus 43210.
Two closely related fibroblast growth factor receptors, FGFR1 and FGFR2, have been cloned from a newt (Notophthalmus viridescens) limb blastema cDNA library. Sequence analysis revealed that we have isolated both the bek and KGFR variants of FGFR2. These two variants differ only in the second half of the last of their three Ig-like domains. The expression patterns of FGFR1 and FGFR2 during limb regeneration have been determined by in situ hybridization. During the preblastema stages of regeneration, FGFR2 expression is observed in the basal layer of the wound epithelium and in the cells of the periosteum. As regeneration progresses to the blastema stages, FGFR2 expression continues to be observed in the basal layer of the wound epithelium with additional hybridization seen in the blastema mesenchyme closely associated with the bisected bones. From the early bud to the mid-bud blastema stage, FGFR1 expression is observed throughout the blastema mesenchyme but, unlike FGFR2, is distinctly absent from the wound epithelium. In the differentiation stages of regeneration, the mesenchymal expression of FGFR2 becomes restricted to the cells of the condensing cartilage and later to the perichondrium. During these later stages of regeneration, the wound epithelium hybridization to the FGFR2 probe is no longer observed. The expression patterns of these receptors suggest that FGFR1 and FGFR2 have distinct roles in limb regeneration, despite their sharing a number of the FGF ligands. Further investigation regarding the potential sources of the FGF ligands will help establish the role that FGFs and FGFRs play in limb regeneration.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Ishino, T. Kunieda, S. Natori, K. Sekimizu, and T. Kubo Identification of Novel Members of the Xenopus Ca2+-dependent Lectin Family and Analysis of Their Gene Expression During Tail Regeneration and Development J. Biochem., April 1, 2007; 141(4): 479 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Lee, S. Grill, A. Sanchez, M. Murphy-Ryan, and K. D. Poss Fgf signaling instructs position-dependent growth rate during zebrafish fin regeneration Development, December 1, 2005; 132(23): 5173 - 5183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Launay, J.-M. Cabelguen, J.-F. Marini, and C. Chanoine Effects of locomotor training on hindlimb regeneration in the urodele amphibian Pleurodeles waltlii J. Physiol., August 15, 2001; 535(1): 241 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Hopkins Limb Regeneration in the Fiddler Crab, Uca pugilator: Hormonal and Growth Factor Control Integr. Comp. Biol., June 1, 2001; 41(3): 389 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Del Rio-Tsonis, J. C. Jung, I.-M. Chiu, and P. A. Tsonis Conservation of fibroblast growth factor function in lens regeneration PNAS, December 9, 1997; 94(25): 13701 - 13706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Simon, R Kittappa, P. Khan, C Tsilfidis, R. Liversage, and S Oppenheimer A novel family of T-box genes in urodele amphibian limb development and regeneration: candidate genes involved in vertebrate forelimb/hindlimb patterning Development, January 4, 1997; 124(7): 1355 - 1366. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Mullen, S. Bryant, M. Torok, B Blumberg, and D. Gardiner Nerve dependency of regeneration: the role of Distal-less and FGF signaling in amphibian limb regeneration Development, January 11, 1996; 122(11): 3487 - 3497. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Patrie, A. J. Kudla, B. B. Olwin, and I.-M. Chiu Conservation of Ligand Specificity between the Mammalian and Amphibian Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors J. Biol. Chem., December 1, 1995; 270(48): 29018 - 29024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||