|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 119, Issue 3 661-671, Copyright © 1993 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
R Mayor, LJ Essex, MF Bennett and MG Sargent
Laboratory of Developmental Biology, National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London, UK.
Xsna, the Xenopus homologue of Drosophila snail, is expressed in both mesoderm and ectoderm. Expression occurs in all mesoderm initially but is down regulated in a tissue-specific fashion at the end of gastrulation in a way that reveals the subdivision of the mesoderm before its derivatives are overtly differentiated. Xsna is also expressed in the ectoderm of the prospective neural fold from stage 11, in a distinct band of cells surrounding the prospective neural plate, which we designate the neural plate border. The deep and superficial ectoderm compartments labelled by Xsna represent the prospective neural crest and the prospective roof of the neural tube, respectively. Xsna expression persists in neural crest cells during their subsequent migration. The role of the Xsna promoter in creating this pattern of expression has been investigated by injecting fertilised eggs with constructs containing the 5' upstream sequence of the gene fused to a reporter. An element of 115 base pairs (-160 to -45 relative to the transcriptional start) is sufficient to drive appropriate reporter gene expression. The promoter does not contain a TATA or CAAT box and does not have a high GC content, but RNA synthesis starts precisely at 33 bases upstream to the translational start. The start sequence can be deleted so that transcription is initiated elsewhere without affecting the expression pattern. The distribution of Xsna promoter activity within the embryo, examined using beta-galactosidase (beta-gal) fusions, is similar to that of the endogenous mRNA seen by in situ hybridisation. The contribution of elements within the 5' sequence have been assessed by comparing the expression patterns of constructs that have deletions in this region. Sequences from -112 to -97 are required for mesodermal expression and sequences from -96 to -44 are required for ectodermal expression. The behaviour of the injected promoter constructs differ in one important respect from the endogenous gene in that expression in an animal cap assay is not inducible by mesoderm-inducing factors but is inducible by cells of the vegetal pole.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. Zhao, K. Tanegashima, H. Ro, and I. B. Dawid Lrig3 regulates neural crest formation in Xenopus by modulating Fgf and Wnt signaling pathways Development, April 1, 2008; 135(7): 1283 - 1293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. L. McNulty, J. N. Peres, N. Bardine, W. M. R. van den Akker, and A. J. Durston Knockdown of the complete Hox paralogous group 1 leads to dramatic hindbrain and neural crest defects Development, June 15, 2005; 132(12): 2861 - 2871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Morgan, J. M. Woltering, P. M. J. In der Rieden, A. J. Durston, and J. P. Thiery YY1 Regulates the Neural Crest-associated slug Gene in Xenopus laevis J. Biol. Chem., November 5, 2004; 279(45): 46826 - 46834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Tribulo, M. J. Aybar, V. H. Nguyen, M. C. Mullins, and R. Mayor Regulation of Msx genes by a Bmp gradient is essential for neural crest specification Development, December 29, 2003; 130(26): 6441 - 6452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.-H. Monsoro-Burq, R. B. Fletcher, and R. M. Harland Neural crest induction by paraxial mesoderm in Xenopus embryos requires FGF signals Development, July 15, 2003; 130(14): 3111 - 3124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. Aybar, M. A. Nieto, and R. Mayor Snail precedes Slug in the genetic cascade required for the specification and migration of the Xenopus neural crest Development, February 1, 2003; 130(3): 483 - 494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Sefton, S Sanchez, and M. Nieto Conserved and divergent roles for members of the Snail family of transcription factors in the chick and mouse embryo Development, January 8, 1998; 125(16): 3111 - 3121. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H Weber, B Holewa, E. Jones, and G. Ryffel Mesoderm and endoderm differentiation in animal cap explants: identification of the HNF4-binding site as an activin A responsive element in the Xenopus HNF1alpha promoter Development, January 6, 1996; 122(6): 1975 - 1984. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R Mayor, R Morgan, and M. Sargent Induction of the prospective neural crest of Xenopus Development, January 3, 1995; 121(3): 767 - 777. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
