|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 120, Issue 10 2925-2932, Copyright © 1994 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
PP Tam, SX Zhou and SS Tan
Embryology Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, Wentworthville, NSW, Australia.
We have determined the timing of the inactivation and reactivation of the X chromosome in the mouse primordial germ cells (PGCs) by monitoring the expression of an X-linked HMG-lacZ reporter gene. PGCs were identified by their distinct alkaline phosphatase activity and they were first localised in the primitive streak and allantoic bud of the 7.5-day gastrulating embryo. Although inactivation of the transgene was found in some PGCs at these sites, at least 85% of the population were still expressing the lacZ gene. This suggests that, although X-inactivation has commenced during gastrulation, the majority of PGCs still possess two active X chromosomes. Transgene activity remained unchanged during the relocation of PGCs to the hindgut endoderm, but decreased abruptly when PGCs left the hindgut and migrated through the mesentery. X-inactivation was completed during the migration of PGCs, but not simultaneously for the whole population. The first wave of PGCs entering the genital ridge at 9.5 days did not immediately re-activate the silent transgene until about 24 hours later. Re-activation of the transgene took place in over 80% of PGCs entering the genital ridge at 10.5-13.5 days p.c., preceding the entry into meiosis. About 90% of the meiotic germ cells in the 14.5-15.5 day fetal ovary expressed the transgene. Similar profiles of transgene activity were observed in PGCs of embryos that have inherited the lacZ transgene from different parents, showing unequivocally that X-inactivation in the germ cell lineage is not related to parental legacy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. R. Nicholas, S. L. Chavez, V. L. Baker, and R. A. Reijo Pera Instructing an Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Oocyte Fate: Lessons from Endogenous Oogenesis Endocr. Rev., May 1, 2009; 30(3): 264 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. A. Lepore, G. P. L. Thomas, K. R. Knight, A. J. Hussey, T. Callahan, J. Wagner, W. A. Morrison, and P. Q. Thomas Survival and Differentiation of Pituitary Colony-Forming Cells In Vivo Stem Cells, July 1, 2007; 25(7): 1730 - 1736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Savarese, K. Flahndorfer, R. Jaenisch, M. Busslinger, and A. Wutz Hematopoietic precursor cells transiently reestablish permissiveness for x inactivation. Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2006; 26(19): 7167 - 7177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. M. Maatouk, L. D. Kellam, M. R. W. Mann, H. Lei, E. Li, M. S. Bartolomei, and J. L. Resnick DNA methylation is a primary mechanism for silencing postmigratory primordial germ cell genes in both germ cell and somatic cell lineages Development, September 1, 2006; 133(17): 3411 - 3418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Isotani, T. Nakanishi, S. Kobayashi, J. Lee, S. Chuma, N. Nakatsuji, F. Ishino, and M. Okabe Genomic imprinting of XX spermatogonia and XX oocytes recovered from XX{leftrightarrow}XY chimeric testes PNAS, March 15, 2005; 102(11): 4039 - 4044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. HEARD, J. CHAUMEIL, O. MASUI, and I. OKAMOTO Mammalian X-Chromosome Inactivation: An Epigenetics Paradigm Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 2004; 69(0): 89 - 102. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. A. Trainor, D. Sobieszczuk, D. Wilkinson, and R. Krumlauf Signalling between the hindbrain and paraxial tissues dictates neural crest migration pathways Development, March 3, 2003; 129(2): 433 - 442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. de la Casa-Esperon, J C. Loredo-Osti, F. Pardo-Manuel de Villena, T. L. Briscoe, J. M. Malette, J. E. Vaughan, K. Morgan, and C. Sapienza X Chromosome Effect on Maternal Recombination and Meiotic Drive in the Mouse Genetics, August 1, 2002; 161(4): 1651 - 1659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Gavalas, P. Trainor, L. Ariza-McNaughton, and R. Krumlauf Synergy between Hoxa1 and Hoxb1: the relationship between arch patterning and the generation of cranial neural crest Development, August 1, 2001; 128(15): 3017 - 3027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T Tada, Y Obata, M Tada, Y Goto, N Nakatsuji, S Tan, T Kono, and N Takagi Imprint switching for non-random X-chromosome inactivation during mouse oocyte growth Development, January 7, 2000; 127(14): 3101 - 3105. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Goto and M. Monk Regulation of X-Chromosome Inactivation in Development in Mice and Humans Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., June 1, 1998; 62(2): 362 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Lu, J Ma, and J. Eissenberg Developmental regulation of heterochromatin-mediated gene silencing in Drosophila Development, January 6, 1998; 125(12): 2223 - 2234. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P E Szabo and J R Mann Biallelic expression of imprinted genes in the mouse germ line: implications for erasure, establishment, and mechanisms of genomic imprinting. Genes & Dev., August 1, 1995; 9(15): 1857 - 1868. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Weng, T Magnuson, and U Storb Strain-specific transgene methylation occurs early in mouse development and can be recapitulated in embryonic stem cells Development, January 9, 1995; 121(9): 2853 - 2859. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
