spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif ARCHIVE ANNOUNCEMENT! spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schulz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tautz, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schulz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tautz, D.

Development, Vol 120, Issue 10 3043-3049, Copyright © 1994 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Autonomous concentration-dependent activation and repression of Kruppel by hunchback in the Drosophila embryo

C Schulz and D Tautz
Zoologisches Institut, Universitat Munchen, Germany.

The subdivision of the anterior-posterior axis in Drosophila is achieved by a cascade of spatially regulated transcription factors which form short-range gradients at the syncytial blastoderm stage. These factors are assumed to have concentration-dependent regulatory effects on their target genes. However, there is so far little direct in vivo evidence that a single factor can autonomously activate and repress a given target gene. We have analysed here the regulatory capabilities of the gap gene hunchback by creating an artificial gradient of hunchback in the early embryo. This was achieved by providing the maternally expressed mRNA of hunchback with the anterior localization signal of the bicoid RNA. The effects of this artificial hunchback gradient were then studied in different types of mutant background. We show that under these conditions hb is autonomously capable of activating the target gene Kruppel at low concentrations and repressing it at high concentrations. In addition, we show that the artificially created hunchback gradient can organize a large part of the segment pattern, although it is expressed at a different position and in a different shape than the wild-type gradient of hunchback.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
H. Marques-Souza, M. Aranda, and D. Tautz
Delimiting the conserved features of hunchback function for the trunk organization of insects
Development, March 1, 2008; 135(5): 881 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. Papatsenko and M. S. Levine
Dual regulation by the Hunchback gradient in the Drosophila embryo
PNAS, February 26, 2008; 105(8): 2901 - 2906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. Lebrecht, M. Foehr, E. Smith, F. J. P. Lopes, C. E. Vanario-Alonso, J. Reinitz, D. S. Burz, and S. D. Hanes
Bicoid cooperative DNA binding is critical for embryonic patterning in Drosophila
PNAS, September 13, 2005; 102(37): 13176 - 13181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
M. A. Pultz, L. Westendorf, S. D. Gale, K. Hawkins, J. Lynch, J. N. Pitt, N. L. Reeves, J. C. Y. Yao, S. Small, C. Desplan, et al.
A major role for zygotic hunchback in patterning the Nasonia embryo
Development, August 15, 2005; 132(16): 3705 - 3715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. Jaeger, M. Blagov, D. Kosman, K. N. Kozlov, Manu, E. Myasnikova, S. Surkova, C. E. Vanario-Alonso, M. Samsonova, D. H. Sharp, et al.
Dynamical Analysis of Regulatory Interactions in the Gap Gene System of Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, August 1, 2004; 167(4): 1721 - 1737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
S. Kumar, K. Jayaraman, S. Panchanathan, R. Gurunathan, A. Marti-Subirana, and S. J. Newfeld
BEST: A Novel Computational Approach for Comparing Gene Expression Patterns From Early Stages of Drosophila melanogaster Development
Genetics, December 1, 2002; 162(4): 2037 - 2047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
E. A. Wimmer, A. Carleton, P. Harjes, T. Turner, and C. Desplan
bicoid-Independent Formation of Thoracic Segments in Drosophila
Science, March 31, 2000; 287(5462): 2476 - 2479.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
V. Schaeffer, F. Janody, C. Loss, C. Desplan, and E. A. Wimmer
Bicoid functions without its TATA-binding protein-associated factor interaction domains
PNAS, April 13, 1999; 96(8): 4461 - 4466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
X Wu, R Vakani, and S Small
Two distinct mechanisms for differential positioning of gene expression borders involving the Drosophila gap protein giant
Development, January 10, 1998; 125(19): 3765 - 3774.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
C Wolff, R Schroder, C Schulz, D Tautz, and M Klingler
Regulation of the Tribolium homologues of caudal and hunchback in Drosophila: evidence for maternal gradient systems in a short germ embryo
Development, January 9, 1998; 125(18): 3645 - 3654.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
C Wolff, R Sommer, R Schroder, G Glaser, and D Tautz
Conserved and divergent expression aspects of the Drosophila segmentation gene hunchback in the short germ band embryo of the flour beetle Tribolium
Development, January 12, 1995; 121(12): 4227 - 4236.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
C Schulz and D Tautz
Zygotic caudal regulation by hunchback and its role in abdominal segment formation of the Drosophila embryo
Development, January 4, 1995; 121(4): 1023 - 1028.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1994