spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Slack, JMW.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Slack, JMW.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Development, Vol 121, Issue 1 249-262, Copyright © 1995 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

The Xenopus laevis tail-forming region

A. S. Tucker and JMW. Slack

A fate map is produced for the Xenopus tail-forming region at the neurula stage by orthotopic grafting of tissue labelled with fluorescein-dextran amine. It is shown that the axial tissues of the tail are derived from a rectangle 700 micrometre wide by 600 micrometre long, while the epidermis of the tail is drawn from a much larger area. The fate map shows that much of the final tail is not formed from the tail bud itself, but by a displacement of trunk axial tissue relative to the proctodaeum. A specification map is also produced by culturing parts of the tail-forming region in vitro or as grafts on a neutral site on host embryos. For the axial tissues this map is identical to the fate map, showing that the tail-forming region is embryologically mosaic. The prospective tail epidermis can, however, regulate defects. It is shown that previous claims of regeneration of the Xenopus tail bud are misleading. Removal of the tail-forming region totally prevents tail development. Removal of the tail bud leads to a partial tail, formed by the normal process of displacement of trunk tissue relative to the proctodaeum. Even when only part of the tail bud is removed the tail is still truncated. This shows that there is no terminal regeneration of the tail at embryonic stages.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Sci SignalHome page
J. M. W. Slack
The Spark of Life: Electricity and Regeneration
Sci. Signal., September 25, 2007; 2007(405): pe54 - pe54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
C. Gargioli and J. M. W. Slack
Cell lineage tracing during Xenopus tail regeneration
Development, June 1, 2004; 131(11): 2669 - 2679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
F. Marlow,, E. M. Gonzalez,,, C. Yin, C. Rojo, and L. Solnica-Krezel,
No tail co-operates with non-canonical Wnt signaling to regulate posterior body morphogenesis in zebrafish
Development, January 1, 2004; 131(1): 203 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
S. Connors, J Trout, M Ekker, and M. Mullins
The role of tolloid/mini fin in dorsoventral pattern formation of the zebrafish embryo
Development, January 6, 1999; 126(14): 3119 - 3130.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
C. Beck and J. Slack
A developmental pathway controlling outgrowth of the Xenopus tail bud
Development, January 4, 1999; 126(8): 1611 - 1620.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
V Knezevic, R De Santo, and S Mackem
Continuing organizer function during chick tail development
Development, January 5, 1998; 125(10): 1791 - 1801.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
M. Richardson, S. Allen, G. Wright, A Raynaud, and J Hanken
Somite number and vertebrate evolution
Development, January 1, 1998; 125(2): 151 - 160.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
M Andreazzoli, M Pannese, and E Boncinelli
Activating and repressing signals in head development: the role of Xotx1 and Xotx2
Development, January 5, 1997; 124(9): 1733 - 1743.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
J. Kanki and R. Ho
The development of the posterior body in zebrafish
Development, January 2, 1997; 124(4): 881 - 893.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant BiolHome page
G.-J. Rauch, M. Hammerschmidt, P. Blader, H.E. Schauerte, U. Strahle, P.W. Ingham, A.P. McMahon, and P. Haffter
WNT5 Is Required for Tail Formation in the Zebrafish Embryo
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 1997; 62(0): 227 - 234.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
A. Melby, R. Warga, and C. Kimmel
Specification of cell fates at the dorsal margin of the zebrafish gastrula
Development, July 1, 1996; 122(7): 2225 - 2237.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
L Solnica-Krezel, D. Stemple, E Mountcastle-Shah, Z Rangini, S. Neuhauss, J Malicki, A. Schier, D. Stainier, F Zwartkruis, S Abdelilah, et al.
Mutations affecting cell fates and cellular rearrangements during gastrulation in zebrafish
Development, January 12, 1996; 123(1): 67 - 80.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
M Hammerschmidt, F Pelegri, M. Mullins, D. Kane, M Brand, F. van Eeden, M Furutani-Seiki, M Granato, P Haffter, C. Heisenberg, et al.
Mutations affecting morphogenesis during gastrulation and tail formation in the zebrafish, Danio rerio
Development, January 12, 1996; 123(1): 143 - 151.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1995