|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 124, Issue 15 2983-2996, Copyright © 1997 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
AC Foley, KG Storey and CD Stern
Department of Genetics and Development, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
The avian equivalent of Spemann's organizer, Hensen's node, begins to lose its ability to induce a nervous system from area opaca epiblast cells at stage 4+, immediately after the full primitive streak stage. From this stage, the node is no longer able to induce regions of the nervous system anterior to the hindbrain. Stage 4+ is marked by the emergence from the node of a group of cells, the prechordal mesendoderm. Here we have investigated whether the prechordal region possesses the lost functions of the organizer, using quail-chick chimaeras to distinguish graft- and host-derived cells, together with several region-specific molecular markers. We find that the prechordal region does not have neural inducing ability, as it is unable to divert extraembryonic epiblast cells to a neural fate. However, it can confer more anterior character to prospective hindbrain cells of the host, making them acquire expression of the forebrain markers tailless and Otx-2. It can also rescue the expression of Krox-20 and Otx-2 from nervous system induced by an older (stage 5) node in extraembryonic epiblast. We show that these properties reflect a true change of fate of cells rather than recruitment from other regions. The competence of neuroectoderm to respond to anteriorizing signals declines by stages 7-9, but both posteriorizing signals and the ability of neuroectoderm to respond to them persist after this stage.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. D. Stern Neural induction: old problem, new findings, yet more questions Development, May 1, 2005; 132(9): 2007 - 2021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. C. Chapman, F. R. Schubert, G. C. Schoenwolf, and A. Lumsden Anterior identity is established in chick epiblast by hypoblast and anterior definitive endoderm Development, November 1, 2003; 130(21): 5091 - 5101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Halilagic, M. H. Zile, and M. Studer A novel role for retinoids in patterning the avian forebrain during presomite stages Development, May 15, 2003; 130(10): 2039 - 2050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. A. Sanders, A. Lumsden, and C. W. Ragsdale Arcuate Plan of Chick Midbrain Development J. Neurosci., December 15, 2002; 22(24): 10742 - 10750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. E. Erter, T. P. Wilm, N. Basler, C. V. E. Wright, and L. Solnica-Krezel Wnt8 is required in lateral mesendodermal precursors for neural posteriorization in vivo Development, September 15, 2001; 128(18): 3571 - 3583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S Withington, R Beddington, and J Cooke Foregut endoderm is required at head process stages for anteriormost neural patterning in chick Development, January 2, 2001; 128(3): 309 - 320. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. B. Constam and E. J. Robertson SPC4/PACE4 regulates a TGFbeta signaling network during axis formation Genes & Dev., May 1, 2000; 14(9): 1146 - 1155. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Foley, I Skromne, and C. Stern Reconciling different models of forebrain induction and patterning: a dual role for the hypoblast Development, January 9, 2000; 127(17): 3839 - 3854. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C Vesque, S Ellis, A Lee, M Szabo, P Thomas, R Beddington, and M Placzek Development of chick axial mesoderm: specification of prechordal mesoderm by anterior endoderm-derived TGFbeta family signalling Development, January 7, 2000; 127(13): 2795 - 2809. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Tremblay, P. Hoodless, E. Bikoff, and E. Robertson Formation of the definitive endoderm in mouse is a Smad2-dependent process Development, January 7, 2000; 127(14): 3079 - 3090. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Camus, B. Davidson, S Billiards, P Khoo, J. Rivera-Perez, M Wakamiya, R. Behringer, and P. Tam The morphogenetic role of midline mesendoderm and ectoderm in the development of the forebrain and the midbrain of the mouse embryo Development, January 5, 2000; 127(9): 1799 - 1813. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Rowan, C. Stern, and K. Storey Axial mesendoderm refines rostrocaudal pattern in the chick nervous system Development, January 7, 1999; 126(13): 2921 - 2934. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y Suda, J Nakabayashi, I Matsuo, and S Aizawa Functional equivalency between Otx2 and Otx1 in development of the rostral head Development, January 2, 1999; 126(4): 743 - 757. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H Knoetgen, C Viebahn, and M Kessel Head induction in the chick by primitive endoderm of mammalian, but not avian origin Development, January 2, 1999; 126(4): 815 - 825. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E Pera, S Stein, and M Kessel Ectodermal patterning in the avian embryo: epidermis versus neural plate Development, January 1, 1999; 126(1): 63 - 73. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K Dale, N Sattar, J Heemskerk, J. Clarke, M Placzek, and J Dodd Differential patterning of ventral midline cells by axial mesoderm is regulated by BMP7 and chordin Development, January 1, 1999; 126(2): 397 - 408. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Acampora, V Avantaggiato, F Tuorto, P Briata, G Corte, and A Simeone Visceral endoderm-restricted translation of Otx1 mediates recovery of Otx2 requirements for specification of anterior neural plate and normal gastrulation Development, January 12, 1998; 125(24): 5091 - 5104. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y Grinblat, J Gamse, M Patel, and H Sive Determination of the zebrafish forebrain: induction and patterning Development, January 11, 1998; 125(22): 4403 - 4416. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V Knezevic, R De Santo, and S Mackem Continuing organizer function during chick tail development Development, January 5, 1998; 125(10): 1791 - 1801. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Streit, K. Lee, I Woo, C Roberts, T. Jessell, and C. Stern Chordin regulates primitive streak development and the stability of induced neural cells, but is not sufficient for neural induction in the chick embryo Development, January 2, 1998; 125(3): 507 - 519. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
