|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 125, Issue 10 1931-1942, Copyright © 1998 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
S Wacker, A Brodbeck, P Lemaire, C Niehrs and R Winklbauer
Universitat zu Koln, Zoologisches Institut, Koln, Germany. rwinkl@novell.biolan.uni-koeln.de
By comparing cells with respect to several motility-related properties and the ability to migrate on fibronectin, three cell types can be distinguished in the Xenopus gastrula. These occur in a distinct spatial pattern, thus defining three motility domains which do not correspond to the prospective germ layers. Migratory behavior is confined to a region encompassing the anterior mesoderm and endoderm. When stationary animal cap cells are induced to migrate by treatment with activin, cells become adhesive at low concentrations of fibronectin, show polarized protrusive activity, and form lamellipodia. Adhesion and polarization, but not lamellipodia formation, are mimicked by the immediate early response gene Mix.1. Goosecoid, another immediate early gene, is without effect when expressed alone in animal cap cells, but it acts synergistically with Mix.1 in the control of adhesion, and antagonistically in the polarization of protrusive activity. bFGF also induces migration, lamellipodia formation and polarization in animal cap cells, but has no effect on adhesion. By the various treatments of animal cap cells, new combinations of motile properties can be generated, yielding cell types which are not found in the embryo.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. Tao, M. Shimizu, R. Kusumoto, K. Ono, S. Noji, and H. Ohuchi A dual role of FGF10 in proliferation and coordinated migration of epithelial leading edge cells during mouse eyelid development Development, July 15, 2005; 132(14): 3217 - 3230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Nagel, E. Tahinci, K. Symes, and R. Winklbauer Guidance of mesoderm cell migration in the Xenopus gastrula requires PDGF signaling Development, June 1, 2004; 131(11): 2727 - 2736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Lebreton, L. Boissel, and J. Moreau Control of embryonic Xenopus morphogenesis by a Ral-GDS/Xral branch of the Ras signalling pathway J. Cell Sci., November 15, 2003; 116(22): 4651 - 4662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. M. Kwan and M. W. Kirschner Xbra functions as a switch between cell migration and convergent extension in the Xenopus gastrula Development, May 1, 2003; 130(9): 1961 - 1972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. L. Nutt, K. S. Dingwell, C. E. Holt, and E. Amaya Xenopus Sprouty2 inhibits FGF-mediated gastrulation movements but does not affect mesoderm induction and patterning Genes & Dev., May 1, 2001; 15(9): 1152 - 1166. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Djiane, J Riou, M Umbhauer, J Boucaut, and D Shi Role of frizzled 7 in the regulation of convergent extension movements during gastrulation in Xenopus laevis Development, January 7, 2000; 127(14): 3091 - 3100. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Gurdon, H Standley, S Dyson, K Butler, T Langon, K Ryan, F Stennard, K Shimizu, and A Zorn Single cells can sense their position in a morphogen gradient Development, January 12, 1999; 126(23): 5309 - 5317. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R Winklbauer and M Schurfeld Vegetal rotation, a new gastrulation movement involved in the internalization of the mesoderm and endoderm in Xenopus Development, January 8, 1999; 126(16): 3703 - 3713. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Latinkic and J. Smith Goosecoid and mix.1 repress Brachyury expression and are required for head formation in Xenopus Development, January 4, 1999; 126(8): 1769 - 1779. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. E. Mead, Y. Zhou, K. D. Lustig, T. L. Huber, M. W. Kirschner, and L. I. Zon Cloning of Mix-related homeodomain proteins using fast retrieval of gel shift activities, (FROGS), a technique for the isolation of DNA-binding proteins PNAS, September 15, 1998; 95(19): 11251 - 11256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
