|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 126, Issue 13 2921-2934, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
AM Rowan, CD Stern and KG Storey
Human Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QX, UK. kstorey@ermine.ox.ac.uk
There has long been controversy concerning the role of the axial mesoderm in the induction and rostrocaudal patterning of the vertebrate nervous system. Here we investigate the neural inducing and regionalising properties of defined rostrocaudal regions of head process/prospective notochord in the chick embryo by juxtaposing these tissues with extraembryonic epiblast or neural plate explants. We localise neural inducing signals to the emerging head process and using a large panel of region-specific neural markers, show that different rostrocaudal levels of the head process derived from headfold stage embryos can induce discrete regions of the central nervous system. However, we also find that rostral and caudal head process do not induce expression of any of these molecular markers in explants of the neural plate. During normal development the head process emerges beneath previously induced neural plate, which we show has already acquired some rostrocaudal character. Our findings therefore indicate that discrete regions of axial mesendoderm at headfold stages are not normally responsible for the establishment of rostrocaudal pattern in the neural plate. Strikingly however, we do find that caudal head process inhibits expression of rostral genes in neural plate explants. These findings indicate that despite the ability to induce specific rostrocaudal regions of the CNS de novo, signals provided by the discrete regions of axial mesendoderm do not appear to establish regional differences, but rather refine the rostrocaudal character of overlying neuroepithelium.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. D. Stern Neural induction: old problem, new findings, yet more questions Development, May 1, 2005; 132(9): 2007 - 2021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Rhinn, K. Lun, M. Luz, M. Werner, and M. Brand Positioning of the midbrain-hindbrain boundary organizer through global posteriorization of the neuroectoderm mediated by Wnt8 signaling Development, March 15, 2005; 132(6): 1261 - 1272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Halilagic, M. H. Zile, and M. Studer A novel role for retinoids in patterning the avian forebrain during presomite stages Development, May 15, 2003; 130(10): 2039 - 2050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Lance-Jones, N. Omelchenko, A. Bailis, S. Lynch, and K. Sharma Hoxd10 induction and regionalization in the developing lumbosacral spinal cord Development, June 15, 2001; 128(12): 2255 - 2268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Foley, I Skromne, and C. Stern Reconciling different models of forebrain induction and patterning: a dual role for the hypoblast Development, January 9, 2000; 127(17): 3839 - 3854. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Camus, B. Davidson, S Billiards, P Khoo, J. Rivera-Perez, M Wakamiya, R. Behringer, and P. Tam The morphogenetic role of midline mesendoderm and ectoderm in the development of the forebrain and the midbrain of the mouse embryo Development, January 5, 2000; 127(9): 1799 - 1813. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
