|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 126, Issue 14 3191-3203, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
M Hidalgo-Sanchez, A Simeone and RM Alvarado-Mallart
INSERM Unite 106, Hopital de la Salpetriere, Bld. de l'Hopital, France.
Chick/quail transplantation experiments were performed to analyse possible factors involved in the regionalisation of the midbrain-hindbrain domain. The caudal prosomeres, expressing Otx2, were transplanted at stage HH10 into rostrocaudal levels of the midbrain-hindbrain domain, either straddling the intra-metencephalic constriction (type 1 grafts), or at rostral and medial levels of pro-rhombomere A1 (type 2 and 3 grafts, respectively); thus, in all situations, one border of the graft was in contact with the host Gbx2- and Fgf8-expressing domains. The area containing the graft, recognised by QCPN immunohistochemistry, was first analysed 48 hours after transplantation for Otx2, Gbx2, En2 and Fgf8. Although in all three situations, a large part of the graft maintained Otx2 expression, another part became Otx2 negative and was induced to express Gbx2 and Fgf8. These inductive events occurred exclusively at the interface between the Otx2-positive transplanted domain and the ipsilateral host Gbx2-positive rhombomere 1, creating a new Otx2-Gbx2 boundary within the grafted territory. In type 1 and 2 grafts, the induced Fgf8 domain is in continuity with the host Fgf8 isthmic domain, whereas for type 3 grafts, these two domains are separate. High levels of En2 expression were also induced in the area expressing Gbx2 and Fgf8, and Wnt1 and Pax2 expressions, analysed in type 3 grafts, were induced at the intragraft Otx2-Gbx2 new boundary. Moreover, at later embryonic stages, the graft developed meso-isthmo-cerebellar structures. Thus, gene expressions induced in the grafted prosencephalon not only mimicked the pattern observed in the normal midbrain-hindbrain domain, but is followed by midbrain-hindbrain cytodifferentiation, indicating that not only Fgf8 but also confrontation of Otx2 and Gbx2 may play an essential role during midbrian-hindbrain regionalisation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Suzuki-Hirano, T. Sato, and H. Nakamura Regulation of isthmic Fgf8 signal by sprouty2 Development, January 15, 2005; 132(2): 257 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Sato and H. Nakamura The Fgf8 signal causes cerebellar differentiation by activating the Ras-ERK signaling pathway Development, September 1, 2004; 131(17): 4275 - 4285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Brodski, D. M. V. Weisenhorn, M. Signore, I. Sillaber, M. Oesterheld, V. Broccoli, D. Acampora, A. Simeone, and W. Wurst Location and Size of Dopaminergic and Serotonergic Cell Populations Are Controlled by the Position of the Midbrain-Hindbrain Organizer J. Neurosci., May 15, 2003; 23(10): 4199 - 4207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Matsunaga, T. Katahira, and H. Nakamura Role of Lmx1b and Wnt1 in mesencephalon and metencephalon development Development, March 13, 2003; 129(22): 5269 - 5277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Reim and M. Brand spiel-ohne-grenzen/pou2 mediates regional competence to respond to Fgf8 during zebrafish early neural development Development, March 4, 2003; 129(4): 917 - 933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Y. H. Li and A. L. Joyner Otx2 and Gbx2 are required for refinement and not induction of mid-hindbrain gene expression Development, December 15, 2001; 128(24): 4979 - 4991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Sato, I. Araki, and H. Nakamura Inductive signal and tissue responsiveness defining the tectum and the cerebellum Development, July 1, 2001; 128(13): 2461 - 2469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Adams, J. Maida, J. Golden, and R. Riddle The transcription factor Lmx1b maintains Wnt1 expression within the isthmic organizer Development, January 5, 2000; 127(9): 1857 - 1867. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
