|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 126, Issue 23 5309-5317, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
JB Gurdon, H Standley, S Dyson, K Butler, T Langon, K Ryan, F Stennard, K Shimizu and A Zorn
Wellcome CRC Institute, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK. jbg1000@hermes.cam.ac.uk
Xenopus blastula cells show a morphogen-like response to activin by expressing different genes according to the concentration of activin to which they are exposed. To understand how cells recognize their position in a concentration gradient, it is essential to know whether each cell responds individually to activin concentration. An alternative idea, proposed by previous work, is that cells need to interact with their neighbours to generate a concentration-related response. To distinguish between these ideas, we have cultured blastula cells under conditions which provide different degrees of contact with other cells, allowing nil to maximum communication with their neighbours. The cultures include cells attached to fibronectin and cells resting unattached on an agarose base. The cultures also include cells that have no contact with any cell except their clonal progeny, cells that have lateral contact to neighbouring cells, and cells that are completely enveloped by other cells in a reaggregate. We have used RNase protection and in situ hybridization to assay the expression of the activin-responsive Xenopus genes Xbra, Xgsc, Xeomes, Xapod, Xchordin, Mix1, Xlim1 and Cerberus. We find no difference in gene expression between cells attached to fibronectin and those unattached on agarose. Most importantly, we find that cells respond to activin in a concentration-related way irrespective of their degree of contact with other cells. Therefore interaction among cells is not required for the interpretation of morphogen concentration, at least in the case of the early genes studied here. We conclude that isolated blastula cells can sense and respond individually to activin by expressing genes in a concentration-dependent way.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. S. Hu, L. T. Doan, D. S. Currle, M. Paff, J. Y. Rheem, R. Schreyer, B. Robert, and E. S. Monuki Border formation in a Bmp gradient reduced to single dissociated cells PNAS, March 4, 2008; 105(9): 3398 - 3403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. M. Shen Nodal signaling: developmental roles and regulation Development, March 15, 2007; 134(6): 1023 - 1034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Daniels, K. Shimizu, A. M. Zorn, and S.-i. Ohnuma Negative regulation of Smad2 by PIASy is required for proper Xenopus mesoderm formation Development, November 15, 2004; 131(22): 5613 - 5626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. C. Wardle and J. C. Smith Refinement of gene expression patterns in the early Xenopus embryo Development, October 1, 2004; 131(19): 4687 - 4696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. M. Kwan and M. W. Kirschner Xbra functions as a switch between cell migration and convergent extension in the Xenopus gastrula Development, May 1, 2003; 130(9): 1961 - 1972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Muller and H. Rohrer Molecular control of ciliary neuron development: BMPs and downstream transcriptional control in the parasympathetic lineage Development, March 14, 2003; 129(24): 5707 - 5717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.-Y. Bourillot, N. Garrett, and J. B. Gurdon A changing morphogen gradient is interpreted by continuous transduction flow Development, January 5, 2002; 129(9): 2167 - 2180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
