Development, Vol 126, Issue 6 1201-1210, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Transcriptional repression by the Drosophila giant protein: cis element positioning provides an alternative means of interpreting an effector gradient

GF Hewitt, BS Strunk, C Margulies, T Priputin, XD Wang, R Amey, BA Pabst, D Kosman, J Reinitz and DN Arnosti
Department of Biochemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA.

Early developmental patterning of the Drosophila embryo is driven by the activities of a diverse set of maternally and zygotically derived transcription factors, including repressors encoded by gap genes such as Kruppel, knirps, giant and the mesoderm-specific snail. The mechanism of repression by gap transcription factors is not well understood at a molecular level. Initial characterization of these transcription factors suggests that they act as short-range repressors, interfering with the activity of enhancer or promoter elements 50 to 100 bp away. To better understand the molecular mechanism of short-range repression, we have investigated the properties of the Giant gap protein. We tested the ability of endogenous Giant to repress when bound close to the transcriptional initiation site and found that Giant effectively represses a heterologous promoter when binding sites are located at -55 bp with respect to the start of transcription. Consistent with its role as a short-range repressor, as the binding sites are moved to more distal locations, repression is diminished. Rather than exhibiting a sharp 'step-function' drop-off in activity, however, repression is progressively restricted to areas of highest Giant concentration. Less than a two-fold difference in Giant protein concentration is sufficient to determine a change in transcriptional status of a target gene. This effect demonstrates that Giant protein gradients can be differentially interpreted by target promoters, depending on the exact location of the Giant binding sites within the gene. Thus, in addition to binding site affinity and number, cis element positioning within a promoter can affect the response of a gene to a repressor gradient. We also demonstrate that a chimeric Gal4-Giant protein lacking the basic/zipper domain can specifically repress reporter genes, suggesting that the Giant effector domain is an autonomous repression domain.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L.-C. Yao, S. Phin, J. Cho, C. Rushlow, K. Arora, and R. Warrior Multiple modular promoter elements drive graded brinker expression in response to the Dpp morphogen gradient Development, June 15, 2008; 135(12): 2183 - 2192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. R. Sanders, M. Patel, and J. W. Mahaffey The Drosophila Gap Gene giant Has an Anterior Segment Identity Function Mediated Through disconnected and teashirt Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 441 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Martinez and D. N. Arnosti Spreading of a Corepressor Linked to Action of Long-Range Repressor Hairy Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2008; 28(8): 2792 - 2802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Brent, G. Yucel, S. Small, and C. Desplan Permissive and Instructive Anterior Patterning Rely on mRNA Localization in the Wasp Embryo Science, March 30, 2007; 315(5820): 1841 - 1843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Struffi and D. N. Arnosti Functional Interaction between the Drosophila Knirps Short Range Transcriptional Repressor and RPD3 Histone Deacetylase J. Biol. Chem., December 9, 2005; 280(49): 40757 - 40765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. Winter and G. Campbell Repression of Dpp targets in the Drosophila wing by Brinker Development, December 15, 2004; 131(24): 6071 - 6081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Sutrias-Grau and D. N. Arnosti CtBP Contributes Quantitatively to Knirps Repression Activity in an NAD Binding-Dependent Manner Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2004; 24(13): 5953 - 5966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Struffi, M. Corado, M. Kulkarni, and D. N. Arnosti Quantitative contributions of CtBP-dependent and -independent repression activities of Knirps Development, May 15, 2004; 131(10): 2419 - 2429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Bucher and M. Klingler Divergent segmentation mechanism in the short germ insect Tribolium revealed by giant expression and function Development, April 15, 2004; 131(8): 1729 - 1740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Kulkarni and D. N. Arnosti Information display by transcriptional enhancers Development, December 29, 2003; 130(26): 6569 - 6575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-R. Ryu and D. N. Arnosti Functional similarity of Knirps CtBP-dependent and CtBP-independent transcriptional repressor activities Nucleic Acids Res., August 1, 2003; 31(15): 4654 - 4662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Courey and S. Jia Transcriptional repression: the long and the short of it Genes & Dev., November 1, 2001; 15(21): 2786 - 2796. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-R. Ryu, L. K. Olson, and D. N. Arnosti Cell-type specificity of short-range transcriptional repressors PNAS, October 25, 2001; (2001) 231394998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. L. Keplinger, X. Guo, J. Quine, Y. Feng, and D. R. Cavener Complex Organization of Promoter and Enhancer Elements Regulate the Tissue- and Developmental Stage-Specific Expression of the Drosophila melanogaster Gld Gene Genetics, February 1, 2001; 157(2): 699 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. A. Keller, Y. Mao, P. Struffi, C. Margulies, C. E. Yurk, A. R. Anderson, R. L. Amey, S. Moore, J. M. Ebels, K. Foley, et al. dCtBP-Dependent and -Independent Repression Activities of the Drosophila Knirps Protein Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2000; 20(19): 7247 - 7258. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				Y. Nibu and M. S. Levine CtBP-dependent activities of the short-range Giant repressor in the Drosophila embryo PNAS, May 22, 2001; 98(11): 6204 - 6208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-R. Ryu, L. K. Olson, and D. N. Arnosti Cell-type specificity of short-range transcriptional repressors PNAS, November 6, 2001; 98(23): 12960 - 12965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]