|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 127, Issue 13 2965-2976, Copyright © 2000 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
A Nasiadka, A Grill and HM Krause
Banting and Best Department of Medical Research, Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, University of Toronto, Charles H. Best Institute, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1L6, Canada. h.krause@utoronto.ca
Homeodomain proteins are DNA-binding transcription factors that control major developmental patterning events. Although DNA binding is mediated by the homeodomain, interactions with other transcription factors play an unusually important role in the selection and regulation of target genes. A major question in the field is whether these cofactor interactions select target genes by modulating DNA binding site specificity (selective binding model), transcriptional activity (activity regulation model) or both. A related issue is whether the number of target genes bound and regulated is a small or large percentage of genes in the genome. In this study, we have addressed these issues using a chimeric protein that contains the strong activation domain of the viral VP16 protein fused to the Drosophila homeodomain-containing protein Fushi tarazu (Ftz). We find that genes previously thought not to be direct targets of Ftz remain unaffected by FtzVP16. Addition of the VP16 activation domain to Ftz does, however, allow it to regulate previously identified target genes at times and in regions that Ftz alone cannot. It also changes Ftz into an activator of two genes that it normally represses. Taken together, the results suggest that Ftz binds and regulates a relatively limited number of target genes, and that cofactors affect target gene specificity primarily by controlling binding site selection. Activity regulation then fine-tunes the temporal and spatial domains of promoter responses, the magnitude of these responses, and whether they are positive or negative.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Kumar, K. Jayaraman, S. Panchanathan, R. Gurunathan, A. Marti-Subirana, and S. J. Newfeld BEST: A Novel Computational Approach for Comparing Gene Expression Patterns From Early Stages of Drosophila melanogaster Development Genetics, December 1, 2002; 162(4): 2037 - 2047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Hjalt, B. A. Amendt, and J. C. Murray Pitx2 Regulates Procollagen Lysyl Hydroxylase (Plod) Gene Expression: Implications for the Pathology of Rieger Syndrome J. Cell Biol., February 5, 2001; 152(3): 545 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. O'Keefe and J. Thomas Drosophila wing development in the absence of dorsal identity Development, January 3, 2001; 128(5): 703 - 710. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Zhao, V. Dave, F. Yang, T. Scarborough, and J. Ma Target Selectivity of Bicoid Is Dependent on Nonconsensus Site Recognition and Protein-Protein Interaction Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2000; 20(21): 8112 - 8123. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||