|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 127, Issue 17 3683-3694, Copyright © 2000 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
CL Hughes and TC Kaufman
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Insects have evolved a large variety of specialized feeding strategies, with a corresponding variability in mouthpart morphology. We have, however, little understanding of the developmental mechanisms that underlie this diversity. Until recently it was difficult to perform any analysis of gene function outside of the genetic model insects Drosophila melanogaster and Tribolium castaneum. In this paper, we report the use of dsRNA-mediated interference (RNAi) to dissect gene function in the development of the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus, which has specialized suctorial mouthparts. The Hox genes Deformed (Dfd), proboscipedia (pb) and Sex combs reduced (Scr) have previously been shown to be expressed in the gnathal appendages of this species. Strikingly, the milkweed bug was found to have an unusual expression pattern of pb. Here, by analyzing single and combination RNAi depletions, we find that Dfd, pb and Scr are used in the milkweed bug to specify the identity of the mouthparts. The exact roles of the genes, however, are different from what is known in the two genetic model insects. The maxillary appendages in the bug are determined by the activities of the genes Dfd and Scr, rather than Dfd and pb as in the fly and beetle. The mandibular appendages are specified by Dfd, but their unique morphology in Oncopeltus suggests that Dfd's target genes are different. As in flies and beetles, the labium is specified by the combined activities of pb and Scr, but again, the function of pb appears to be different. Additionally, the regulatory control of pb by the other two genes seems to be different in the bug than in either of the other species. These novelties in Hox function, expression pattern and regulatory relationships may have been important for the evolution of the unique Hemipteran head.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. D Peel The evolution of developmental gene networks: lessons from comparative studies on holometabolous insects Phil Trans R Soc B, April 27, 2008; 363(1496): 1539 - 1547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D. Shippy, C. D. Rogers, R. W. Beeman, S. J. Brown, and R. E. Denell The Tribolium castaneum Ortholog of Sex combs reduced Controls Dorsal Ridge Development Genetics, September 1, 2006; 174(1): 297 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. F. Erezyilmaz, L. M. Riddiford, and J. W. Truman The pupal specifier broad directs progressive morphogenesis in a direct-developing insect PNAS, May 2, 2006; 103(18): 6925 - 6930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Z. Liu and T. C. Kaufman even-skipped is not a pair-rule gene but has segmental and gap-like functions in Oncopeltus fasciatus, an intermediate germband insect Development, May 1, 2005; 132(9): 2081 - 2092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Herke, N. V. Serio, and B. T. Rogers Functional analyses of tiptop and Antennapedia in the embryonic development of Oncopeltus fasciatus suggests an evolutionary pathway from ground state to insect legs Development, January 1, 2005; 132(1): 27 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Z. Liu and T. C. Kaufman Kruppel is a gap gene in the intermediate germband insect Oncopeltus fasciatus and is required for development of both blastoderm and germband-derived segments Development, September 15, 2004; 131(18): 4567 - 4579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Z. Liu and T. C. Kaufman hunchback is required for suppression of abdominal identity, and for proper germband growth and segmentation in the intermediate germband insect Oncopeltus fasciatus Development, April 1, 2004; 131(7): 1515 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Agrawal, P. V. N. Dasaradhi, A. Mohmmed, P. Malhotra, R. K. Bhatnagar, and S. K. Mukherjee RNA Interference: Biology, Mechanism, and Applications Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., December 1, 2003; 67(4): 657 - 685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Kaufman, D. W. Severson, and G. E. Robinson The Anopheles Genome and Comparative Insect Genomics Science, October 4, 2002; 298(5591): 97 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. DeCamillis, D. L. Lewis, S. J. Brown, R. W. Beeman, and R. E. Denell Interactions of the Tribolium Sex combs reduced and proboscipedia Orthologs in Embryonic Labial Development Genetics, December 1, 2001; 159(4): 1643 - 1648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Casares and R. S. Mann The Ground State of the Ventral Appendage in Drosophila Science, August 24, 2001; 293(5534): 1477 - 1480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||