|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 127, Issue 17 3735-3743, Copyright © 2000 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
V Van De Bor, R Walther and A Giangrande
Institut de Genetique et Biologie Moleculaire et Cellulaire, IGBMC/CNRS/ULP/INSERM - BP 163 67404 ILLKIRCH, c.u. de Strasbourg, France.
In flies, the choice between neuronal and glial fates depends on the asymmetric division of multipotent precursors, the neuroglioblast of the central nervous system and the IIb precursor of the sensory organ lineage. In the central nervous system, the choice between the two fates requires asymmetric distribution of the glial cell deficient/glial cell missing (glide/gcm) RNA in the neuroglioblast. Preferential accumulation of the transcript in one of the daughter cells results in the activation of the glial fate in that cell, which becomes a glial precursor. Here we show that glide/gcm is necessary to induce glial differentiation in the peripheral nervous system. We also present evidence that glide/gcm RNA is not necessary to induce the fate choice in the peripheral multipotent precursor. Indeed, glide/gcm RNA and protein are first detected in one daughter of IIb but not in IIb itself. Thus, glide/gcm is required in both central and peripheral glial cells, but its regulation is context dependent. Strikingly, we have found that only subsets of sensory organs are gliogenic and express glide/gcm. The ability to produce glial cells depends on fixed, lineage related, cues and not on stochastic decisions. Finally, we show that after glide/gcm expression has ceased, the IIb daughter migrates and divides symmetrically to produce several mature glial cells. Thus, the glide/gcm-expressing cell, also called the fifth cell of the sensory organ, is indeed a glial precursor. This is the first reported case of symmetric division in the sensory organ lineage. These data indicate that the organization of the fly peripheral nervous system is more complex than previously thought.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Aigouy, V. Van de Bor, M. Boeglin, and A. Giangrande Time-lapse and cell ablation reveal the role of cell interactions in fly glia migration and proliferation Development, October 15, 2004; 131(20): 5127 - 5138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Soustelle, C. Jacques, B. Altenhein, G. M. Technau, T. Volk, and A. Giangrande Terminal tendon cell differentiation requires the glide/gcm complex Development, September 15, 2004; 131(18): 4521 - 4532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cayouette and M. Raff The orientation of cell division influences cell-fate choice in the developing mammalian retina Development, June 1, 2003; 130(11): 2329 - 2339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shandala, K. Takizawa, and R. Saint The dead ringer/retained transcriptional regulatory gene is required for positioning of the longitudinal glia in the Drosophila embryonic CNS Development, April 15, 2003; 130(8): 1505 - 1513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Shen, W. Zhong, Y. N. Jan, and S. Temple Asymmetric Numb distribution is critical for asymmetric cell division of mouse cerebral cortical stem cells and neuroblasts Development, March 12, 2003; 129(20): 4843 - 4853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Fichelson and M. Gho The glial cell undergoes apoptosis in the microchaete lineage of Drosophila Development, January 1, 2003; 130(1): 123 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Van De Bor, P. Heitzler, S. Leger, C. Plessy, and A. Giangrande Precocious Expression of the Glide/Gcm Glial-Promoting Factor in Drosophila Induces Neurogenesis Genetics, March 1, 2002; 160(3): 1095 - 1106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V Van De Bor and A Giangrande Notch signaling represses the glial fate in fly PNS Development, January 4, 2001; 128(8): 1381 - 1390. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V Orgogozo, F Schweisguth, and Y Bellaiche Lineage, cell polarity and inscuteable function in the peripheral nervous system of the Drosophila embryo Development, January 3, 2001; 128(5): 631 - 643. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||