|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Development, Vol 127, Issue 2 279-289, Copyright © 2000 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
F Janody, R Sturny, F Catala, C Desplan and N Dostatni
LGPD, Institut de Biologie du Developpement de Marseille, Parc Scientifique de Luminy, Case 907, France.
The Torso signal transduction pathway exhibits two opposite effects on the activity of the Bicoid (Bcd) morphogen: (i) Bcd function is repressed by Torso (Tor) at the anterior pole of the embryo leading to a retraction of the expression of many Bcd targets from the most anterior region of the embryo, where the Tor tyrosine kinase receptor is activated, and (ii) Bcd function is strengthened by Tor in a broader anterior region, as indicated by a shift of the posterior border of Bcd targets towards the anterior pole in embryos deprived from Tor activity. Anterior repression of Bcd targets was not observed in embryos lacking maternal contribution of D-sor, which acts downstream of Tor and encodes a MAP-kinase kinase. This indicates that the Ras signalling cascade is directly involved in this process, although the known transcriptional effectors of the Tor pathway, tll and hkb, are not (Ronchi, E., Treisman, J., Dostatni, N., Struhl, G. and Desplan, C. (1993) Cell 74, 347-355). Bcd is a good in vitro substrate for phosphorylation by MAP-kinase and phosphorylation of the protein occur in vivo on MAP-kinase sites. In the presence of a Bcd mutant that could no longer be phosphorylated by MAP-kinase, expression of Bcd targets remained repressed by Tor at the pole while strengthening of Bcd activity was reduced. These experiments indicate that phosphorylation of Bcd by MAP-kinase is likely to be required for the Tor pathway to induce its full positive effect on Bcd. This suggests that Tor signalling acts at a distance from the anterior pole by direct modification of the diffusing Bcd morphogen.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Ochoa-Espinosa, D. Yu, A. Tsirigos, P. Struffi, and S. Small Anterior-posterior positional information in the absence of a strong Bicoid gradient PNAS, March 10, 2009; 106(10): 3823 - 3828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Deshpande, G. Calhoun, and P. Schedl Overlapping mechanisms function to establish transcriptional quiescence in the embryonic Drosophila germline Development, March 15, 2004; 131(6): 1247 - 1257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Zhao, A. York, F. Yang, D. J. Forsthoefel, V. Dave, D. Fu, D. Zhang, M. S. Corado, S. Small, M. A. Seeger, et al. The activity of the Drosophila morphogenetic protein Bicoid is inhibited by a domain located outside its homeodomain Development, January 4, 2002; 129(7): 1669 - 1680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Janody, R. Sturny, V. Schaeffer, Y. Azou, and N. Dostatni Two distinct domains of Bicoid mediate its transcriptional downregulation by the Torso pathway Development, June 15, 2001; 128(12): 2281 - 2290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Flores-Saaib, S Jia, and A. Courey Activation and repression by the C-terminal domain of Dorsal Development, January 5, 2001; 128(10): 1869 - 1879. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V Schaeffer, D Killian, C Desplan, and E. Wimmer High bicoid levels render the terminal system dispensable for Drosophila head development Development, January 9, 2000; 127(18): 3993 - 3999. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F Janody, J Reischl, and N Dostatni Persistence of Hunchback in the terminal region of the Drosophila blastoderm embryo impairs anterior development Development, January 4, 2000; 127(8): 1573 - 1582. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stauber, H. Taubert, and U. Schmidt-Ott Function of bicoid and hunchback homologs in the basal cyclorrhaphan fly Megaselia (Phoridae) PNAS, September 26, 2000; 97(20): 10844 - 10849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||