spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif ARCHIVE ANNOUNCEMENT! spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jockusch, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Nagy, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jockusch, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Nagy, L. M.

Development, Vol 127, Issue 8 1617-1626, Copyright © 2000 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Leg development in flies versus grasshoppers: differences in dpp expression do not lead to differences in the expression of downstream components of the leg patterning pathway

EL Jockusch, C Nulsen, SJ Newfeld and LM Nagy
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.

All insect legs are structurally similar, characterized by five primary segments. However, this final form is achieved in different ways. Primitively, the legs developed as direct outgrowths of the body wall, a condition retained in most insect species. In some groups, including the lineage containing the genus Drosophila, legs develop indirectly from imaginal discs. Our understanding of the molecular mechanisms regulating leg development is based largely on analysis of this derived mode of leg development in the species D. melanogaster. The current model for Drosophila leg development is divided into two phases, embryonic allocation and imaginal disc patterning, which are distinguished by interactions among the genes wingless (wg), decapentaplegic (dpp) and distalless (dll). In the allocation phase, dll is activated by wg but repressed by dpp. During imaginal disc patterning, dpp and wg cooperatively activate dll and also indirectly inhibit the nuclear localization of Extradenticle (Exd), which divide the leg into distal and proximal domains. In the grasshopper Schistocerca americana, the early expression pattern of dpp differs radically from the Drosophila pattern, suggesting that the genetic interactions that allocate the leg differ between the two species. Despite early differences in dpp expression, wg, Dll and Exd are expressed in similar patterns throughout the development of grasshopper and fly legs, suggesting that some aspects of proximodistal (P/D) patterning are evolutionarily conserved. We also detect differences in later dpp expression, which suggests that dpp likely plays a role in limb segmentation in Schistocerca, but not in Drosophila. The divergence in dpp expression is surprising given that all other comparative data on gene expression during insect leg development indicate that the molecular pathways regulating this process are conserved. However, it is consistent with the early divergence in developmental mode between fly and grasshopper limbs.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
D. F. Erezyilmaz
Imperfect eggs and oviform nymphs: a history of ideas about the origins of insect metamorphosis
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2006; 46(6): 795 - 807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
E. L. Jockusch and K. A. Ober
Hypothesis Testing in Evolutionary Developmental Biology: A Case Study from Insect Wings
J. Hered., September 1, 2004; 95(5): 382 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
A. Beermann, M. Aranda, and R. Schroder
The Sp8 zinc-finger transcription factor is involved in allometric growth of the limbs in the beetle Tribolium castaneum
Development, February 15, 2004; 131(4): 733 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
D. J. Emlen and C. E. Allen
Genotype to Phenotype: Physiological Control of Trait Size and Scaling in Insects
Integr. Comp. Biol., November 1, 2003; 43(5): 617 - 634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. I. Galindo, S. A. Bishop, S. Greig, and J. P. Couso
Leg Patterning Driven by Proximal-Distal Interactions and EGFR Signaling
Science, July 12, 2002; 297(5579): 256 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
C. Rauskolb
The establishment of segmentation in the Drosophila leg
Development, November 15, 2001; 128(22): 4511 - 4521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
A Beermann, D. Jay, R. Beeman, M Hulskamp, D Tautz, and G Jurgens
The Short antennae gene of Tribolium is required for limb development and encodes the orthologue of the Drosophila Distal-less protein
Development, January 1, 2001; 128(2): 287 - 297.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
N Niwa, Y Inoue, A Nozawa, M Saito, Y Misumi, H Ohuchi, H Yoshioka, and S Noji
Correlation of diversity of leg morphology in Gryllus bimaculatus (cricket) with divergence in dpp expression pattern during leg development
Development, January 10, 2000; 127(20): 4373 - 4381.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2000