QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dong, P. D. S. Articles by Panganiban, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dong, P. D. S. Articles by Panganiban, G.

Proximodistal domain specification and interactions in developing Drosophila appendages

Department of Anatomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA

*Author for correspondence (e-mail: gepangan{at}facstaff.wisc.edu)

Accepted April 9, 2001

The morphological diversification of appendages represents a crucial aspect of animal body plan evolution. The arthropod antenna and leg are homologous appendages, thought to have arisen via duplication and divergence of an ancestral structure (Snodgrass, R. (1935) Book Principles of Insect Morphology. New York: McGraw-Hill). To gain insight into how variations between the antenna and the leg may have arisen, we have compared the epistatic relationships among three major proximodistal patterning genes, Distal-less, dachshund and homothorax, in the antenna and leg of the insect arthropod Drosophila melanogaster. We find that Drosophila appendages are subdivided into different proximodistal domains specified by specific genes, and that limb-specific interactions between genes and the functions of these genes are crucial for antenna-leg differences. In particular, in the leg, but not in the antenna, mutually antagonistic interactions exist between the proximal and medial domains, as well as between medial and distal domains. The lack of such antagonism in the antenna leads to extensive coexpression of Distal-less and homothorax, which in turn is essential for differentiation of antennal morphology. Furthermore, we report that a fundamental difference between the two appendages is the presence in the leg and absence in the antenna of a functional medial domain specified by dachshund. Our results lead us to propose that the acquisition of particular proximodistal subdomains and the evolution of their interactions has been essential for the diversification of limb morphology.

Key words: Distal-less, homothorax, dachshund, teashirt, decapentaplegic, wingless, hedgehog, Antenna, Leg, Limb, Drosophila

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Lebreton, C. Faucher, D. L. Cribbs, and C. Benassayag Timing of Wingless signalling distinguishes maxillary and antennal identities in Drosophila melanogaster Development, July 1, 2008; 135(13): 2301 - 2309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. D. S. Dong, J. S. Dicks, and G. Panganiban Distal-less and homothorax regulate multiple targets to pattern the Drosophila antenna Development, March 6, 2003; 129(8): 1967 - 1974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Panganiban and J. L. R. Rubenstein Developmental functions of the Distal-less/Dlx homeobox genes Development, January 10, 2002; 129(19): 4371 - 4386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]