spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif ARCHIVE ANNOUNCEMENT! spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Efremova, N.
Right arrow Articles by Schwarz-Sommer, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Efremova, N.
Right arrow Articles by Schwarz-Sommer, Z.
Development 128, 2661-2671 (2001)
© 2001 The Company of Biologists Limited

Epidermal control of floral organ identity by class B homeotic genes in Antirrhinum and Arabidopsis

Nadia Efremova, Marie-Christine Perbal, Alexander Yephremov, Winfried A. Hofmann, Heinz Saedler and Zsuzsanna Schwarz-Sommer*

Max-Planck Institut für Züchtungsforschung, Carl-von-Linné Weg 10, 50289 Köln, Germany

*Author for correspondence (schwarzs{at}mpiz-koeln.mpg.de)

Accepted May 8, 2001

To assess the contribution of the epidermis to the control of petal and stamen organ identity, we have used transgenic Antirrhinum and Arabidopsis plants that expressed the Antirrhinum class B homeotic transcription factors DEFICIENS (DEF) and GLOBOSA (GLO) in the epidermis. Transgene expression was controlled by the ANTIRRHINUM FIDDLEHEAD (AFI) promoter, which directs gene expression to the L1 meristematic layer and, later, to the epidermis of differentiating organs. Transgenic epidermal DEF and GLO chimeras display similar phenotypes, suggesting similar epidermal contributions by the two class B genes in Antirrhinum. Epidermal B function autonomously controls the differentiation of Antirrhinum petal epidermal cell types, but cannot fully control the pattern of cell divisions and the specification of sub-epidermal petal cell-identity by epidermal signalling. This non-autonomous control is enhanced if the endogenous class B genes can be activated from the epidermis. The developmental influence of epidermal B function in Antirrhinum stamen development is very limited. In contrast, epidermal B function in Arabidopsis can control most if not all epidermal and sub-epidermal differentiation events in petals and stamens, without any contribution from the endogenous class B genes. Possible reasons for differences in the efficacy of B-function-mediated cell communication between the two species are discussed. Interestingly, our experiments uncovered partial incompatibility between class B functional homologues. Although the DEFICIENS/PISTILLATA heterodimer is functional in transgenic Arabidopsis plants, the APETALA3/GLOBOSA heterodimer is not.

Key words: Flower development, Epidermal chimeras, Cell communication, MADS-box protein, DEFICIENS, GLOBOSA, FIDDLEHEAD, Arabidopsis, Antirrhinum




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant CellHome page
V. Haywood, F. Kragler, and W. J. Lucas
Plasmodesmata: Pathways for Protein and Ribonucleoprotein Signaling
PLANT CELL, May 1, 2002; 14(90001): S303 - 325.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
X. Wu, D. Weigel, and P. A. Wigge
Signaling in plants by intercellular RNA and protein movement
Genes & Dev., January 15, 2002; 16(2): 151 - 158.
[Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2001