spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif ARCHIVE ANNOUNCEMENT! spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00155


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gerberding, M.
Right arrow Articles by Patel, N. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gerberding, M.
Right arrow Articles by Patel, N. H.
Development 129, 5789-5801 (2002)
Copyright © 2002 The Company of Biologists Limited

Cell lineage analysis of the amphipod crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis reveals an early restriction of cell fates

Matthias Gerberding1,3, William E. Browne2 and Nipam H. Patel1,3,*

1 Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
2 Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
3 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: npatel{at}midway.uchicago.edu)

Accepted 11 September 2002

In the amphipod crustacean, Parhyale hawaiensis, the first few embryonic cleavages are total and generate a stereotypical arrangement of cells. In particular, at the eight-cell stage there are four macromeres and four micromeres, and each of these cells is uniquely identifiable. We describe our studies of the cell fate pattern of these eight blastomeres, and find that the eight clones resulting from these cells set up distinct cell lineages that differ in terms of proliferation, migration and cell fate. Remarkably, the cell fate of each blastomere is restricted to a single germ layer. The ectoderm originates from three of the macromeres, while the remaining macromere generates the visceral mesoderm. Two of the micromeres generate the somatic mesoderm, a third micromere generates the endoderm and the fourth micromere generates the germline. These findings demonstrate for the first time a total cleavage pattern in an arthropod which results in an invariant cell fate of the blastomeres, but notably, the cell lineage pattern of Parhyale reported shows no clear resemblance to those found in spiralians, nematodes or deuterostomes. Finally, the techniques we have developed for the analysis of Parhyale development suggest that this arthropod may be particularly useful for future functional analyses of crustacean development.

Key words: Pattern formation, Cell lineage, Fate map, Crustacea, Parhyale







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002