|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
*Author for correspondence (e-mail: kaufman{at}bio.indiana.edu)
Accepted 12 December 2001
The diversity of the arthropod body plan has long been a fascinating subject of study. A flurry of recent research has analyzed Hox gene expression in various arthropod groups, with hopes of gaining insight into the mechanisms that underlie their evolution. The Hox genes have been analyzed in insects, crustaceans and chelicerates. However, the expression patterns of the Hox genes have not yet been comprehensively analyzed in a myriapod. We present the expression patterns of the ten Hox genes in a centipede, Lithobius atkinsoni, and compare our results to those from studies in other arthropods. We have three major findings. First, we find that Hox gene expression is remarkably dynamic across the arthropods. The expression patterns of the Hox genes in the centipede are in many cases intermediate between those of the chelicerates and those of the insects and crustaceans, consistent with the proposed intermediate phylogenetic position of the Myriapoda. Second, we found two extra Hox genes in the centipede compared with those in Drosophila. Based on its pattern of expression, Hox3 appears to have a typical Hox-like role in the centipede, suggesting that the novel functions of the Hox3 homologs zen and bicoid were adopted somewhere in the crustacean-insect clade. In the centipede, the expression of the gene fushi tarazu suggests that it has both a Hox-like role (as in the mite), as well as a role in segmentation (as in insects). This suggests that this dramatic change in function was achieved via a multifunctional intermediate, a condition maintained in the centipede. Last, we found that Hox expression correlates with tagmatic boundaries, consistent with the theory that changes in Hox genes had a major role in evolution of the arthropod body plan.
Key words: Body plan, Centipede, Chilopoda, Lithobius, Hox, labial, proboscipedia, Hox3, Deformed, Sex combs reduced, fushi tarazu, Antennapedia, Ultrabithorax, abdominal-A, Abdominal-B
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Suzuki, J. W. Truman, and L. M. Riddiford The role of Broad in the development of Tribolium castaneum: implications for the evolution of the holometabolous insect pupa Development, February 1, 2008; 135(3): 569 - 577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. T. Hittinger, D. L. Stern, and S. B. Carroll Pleiotropic functions of a conserved insect-specific Hox peptide motif Development, December 1, 2005; 132(23): 5261 - 5270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Negrisolo, A. Minelli, and G. Valle The Mitochondrial Genome of the House Centipede Scutigera and the Monophyly Versus Paraphyly of Myriapods Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2004; 21(4): 770 - 780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Copf, N. Rabet, S. E. Celniker, and M. Averof Posterior patterning genes and the identification of a unique body region in the brine shrimp Artemia franciscana Development, December 15, 2003; 130(24): 5915 - 5927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. C. Hughes Trilobite Tagmosis and Body Patterning from Morphological and Developmental Perspectives Integr. Comp. Biol., February 1, 2003; 43(1): 185 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||