spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif ARCHIVE ANNOUNCEMENT! spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ishino, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ishino, F.
Development 129, 1807-1817 (2002)
© 2002 The Company of Biologists Limited

Erasing genomic imprinting memory in mouse clone embryos produced from day 11.5 primordial germ cells

Jiyoung Lee1,2, Kimiko Inoue2,3, Ryuichi Ono1,2, Narumi Ogonuki3, Takashi Kohda1,2, Tomoko Kaneko-Ishino2,4, Atsuo Ogura2,3,* and Fumitoshi Ishino1,2,*

1 Gene Research Center, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259 Nagatsuta-cho, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8501, Japan
2 CREST, Japan Science and Technology Corporation (JST), 4-1-8 Hon-machi, Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012, Japan
3 Department of Veterinary Science, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo 162-8640, Japan
4 Tokai University, School of Health Sciences, Bohseidai, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan

*Authors for correspondence (e-mail: fishino{at}bio.titech.ac.jp and aogura{at}nih.go.jp)

Accepted 28 January 2002

Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic mechanism that causes functional differences between paternal and maternal genomes, and plays an essential role in mammalian development. Stage-specific changes in the DNA methylation patterns of imprinted genes suggest that their imprints are erased some time during the primordial germ cell (PGC) stage, before their gametic patterns are re-established during gametogenesis according to the sex of individuals. To define the exact timing and pattern of the erasure process, we have analyzed parental-origin-specific expression of imprinted genes and DNA methylation patterns of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in embryos, each derived from a single day 11.5 to day 13.5 PGC by nuclear transfer. Cloned embryos produced from day 12.5 to day 13.5 PGCs showed growth retardation and early embryonic lethality around day 9.5. Imprinted genes lost their parental-origin-specific expression patterns completely and became biallelic or silenced. We confirmed that clones derived from both male and female PGCs gave the same result, demonstrating the existence of a common default state of genomic imprinting to male and female germlines. When we produced clone embryos from day 11.5 PGCs, their development was significantly improved, allowing them to survive until at least the day 11.5 embryonic stage. Interestingly, several intermediate states of genomic imprinting between somatic cell states and the default states were seen in these embryos. Loss of the monoallelic expression of imprinted genes proceeded in a step-wise manner coordinated specifically for each imprinted gene. DNA demethylation of the DMRs of the imprinted genes in exact accordance with the loss of their imprinted monoallelic expression was also observed. Analysis of DNA methylation in day 10.5 to day 12.5 PGCs demonstrated that PGC clones represented the DNA methylation status of donor PGCs well. These findings provide strong evidence that the erasure process of genomic imprinting memory proceeds in the day 10.5 to day 11.5 PGCs, with the timing precisely controlled for each imprinted gene. The nuclear transfer technique enabled us to analyze the imprinting status of each PGC and clearly demonstrated a close relationship between expression and DNA methylation patterns and the ability of imprinted genes to support development.

Key words: Genomic imprinting, Primordial germ cells, PGC clones, Imprinted genes, DNA methylation, Mouse




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. D. Morgan, W. Dean, H. A. Coker, W. Reik, and S. K. Petersen-Mahrt
Activation-induced Cytidine Deaminase Deaminates 5-Methylcytosine in DNA and Is Expressed in Pluripotent Tissues: IMPLICATIONS FOR EPIGENETIC REPROGRAMMING
J. Biol. Chem., December 10, 2004; 279(50): 52353 - 52360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Charalambous, F. M. Smith, W. R. Bennett, T. E. Crew, F. Mackenzie, and A. Ward
Disruption of the imprinted Grb10 gene leads to disproportionate overgrowth by an Igf2-independent mechanism
PNAS, July 8, 2003; 100(14): 8292 - 8297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002