|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00425
REVIEW ARTICLE |
1 Developmental Biology Program, Institute of Biotechnology, PO Box 56,
FIN-00014, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
2 Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY
10595, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: isalazar{at}mappi.helsinki.fi)
Accepted 29 January 2003
We present a classification of developmental mechanisms that have been shown experimentally to generate pattern and form in metazoan organisms. We propose that all such mechanisms can be organized into three basic categories and that two of these may act as composite mechanisms in two different ways. The simple categories are cell autonomous mechanisms in which cells enter into specific arrangements (`patterns') without interacting, inductive mechanisms in which cell communication leads to changes in pattern by reciprocal or hierarchical alteration of cell phenotypes (`states') and morphogenetic mechanisms in which pattern changes by means of cell interactions that do not change cell states. The latter two types of mechanism can be combined either morphostatically, in which case inductive mechanisms act first, followed by the morphogenetic mechanism, or morphodynamically, in which case both types of mechanisms interact continuously to modify each other's dynamics. We propose that this previously unexplored distinction in the operation of composite developmental mechanisms provides insight into the dynamics of many developmental processes. In particular, morphostatic and morphodynamic mechanisms respond to small changes in their genetic and microenvironmental components in dramatically different ways. We suggest that these differences in `variational properties' lead to morphostatic and morphodynamic mechanisms being represented to different extents in early and late stages of development and to their contributing in distinct ways to morphological transitions in evolution.
Key words: Induction, Pattern formation, Morphodynamic development, Morphostatic development, Morphogenesis, Tooth, Brain, Limb, Evolution, Genetic networks
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. A. Ruiz and C. S. Chen Emergence of Patterned Stem Cell Differentiation Within Multicellular Structures Stem Cells, November 1, 2008; 26(11): 2921 - 2927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Salazar-Ciudad On the origins of morphological variation, canalization, robustness, and evolvability Integr. Comp. Biol., September 1, 2007; 47(3): 390 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J.-Y. Kim, Y.-G. Cha, S.-W. Cho, E.-J. Kim, M.-J. Lee, J.-M. Lee, J. Cai, H. Ohshima, and H.-S. Jung Inhibition of Apoptosis in Early Tooth Development Alters Tooth Shape and Size Journal of Dental Research, June 1, 2006; 85(6): 530 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Yokohama-Tamaki, H. Ohshima, N. Fujiwara, Y. Takada, Y. Ichimori, S. Wakisaka, H. Ohuchi, and H. Harada Cessation of Fgf10 signaling, resulting in a defective dental epithelial stem cell compartment, leads to the transition from crown to root formation Development, April 1, 2006; 133(7): 1359 - 1366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. M. Nelson, R. P. Jean, J. L. Tan, W. F. Liu, N. J. Sniadecki, A. A. Spector, and C. S. Chen From the Cover: Emergent patterns of growth controlled by multicellular form and mechanics PNAS, August 16, 2005; 102(33): 11594 - 11599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
