|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00569
Centre for Cellular and Molecular Dynamics, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: jonathan.clarke{at}ucl.ac.uk)
Accepted 25 April 2003
The behaviour of neural progenitors in the intact vertebrate brain and spinal cord is poorly understood, chiefly because of the inaccessibility and poor optical qualities inherent in many model systems. To overcome these problems we have studied the optically superior brain of the zebrafish embryo and have monitored the in vivo behaviour of fluorescently labelled neural progenitors and their daughter cells throughout a substantial period of hindbrain development. We find the majority (84%) of hindbrain neurons are born from progenitor divisions that generate two neurons and 68% of reconstructed lineage trees contained no asymmetric stem cell-like divisions. No progenitors divided in the manner expected of a classic stem cell; i.e. one that repeatedly self-renews and generates a differentiated cell type by asymmetric division. We also analysed the orientation of progenitor divisions relative to the plane of the ventricular zone (VZ) and find that this does not correlate with the fate of the daughter cells. Our results suggest that in this vertebrate system the molecular determinants that control whether a cell will become a neuron are usually not linked to a mechanism that generates asymmetric divisions.
Key words: In vivo imaging, Vertebrate neurogenesis, Neural progenitor cell fate, Asymmetric division, Zebrafish
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Delaunay, K. Heydon, A. Cumano, M. H. Schwab, J.-L. Thomas, U. Suter, K.-A. Nave, B. Zalc, and N. Spassky Early Neuronal and Glial Fate Restriction of Embryonic Neural Stem Cells J. Neurosci., March 5, 2008; 28(10): 2551 - 2562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Costa, G. Wen, A. Lepier, T. Schroeder, and M. Gotz Par-complex proteins promote proliferative progenitor divisions in the developing mouse cerebral cortex Development, January 1, 2008; 135(1): 11 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Baye and B. A. Link Interkinetic Nuclear Migration and the Selection of Neurogenic Cell Divisions during Vertebrate Retinogenesis J. Neurosci., September 19, 2007; 27(38): 10143 - 10152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Wilcock, J. R. Swedlow, and K. G. Storey Mitotic spindle orientation distinguishes stem cell and terminal modes of neuron production in the early spinal cord Development, May 15, 2007; 134(10): 1943 - 1954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Battiste, A. W. Helms, E. J. Kim, T. K. Savage, D. C. Lagace, C. D. Mandyam, A. J. Eisch, G. Miyoshi, and J. E. Johnson Ascl1 defines sequentially generated lineage-restricted neuronal and oligodendrocyte precursor cells in the spinal cord Development, January 15, 2007; 134(2): 285 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Crump, M. E. Swartz, J. K. Eberhart, and C. B. Kimmel Moz-dependent Hox expression controls segment-specific fate maps of skeletal precursors in the face Development, July 15, 2006; 133(14): 2661 - 2669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wu, Y. Wu, and M. R. Capecchi Motoneurons and oligodendrocytes are sequentially generated from neural stem cells but do not appear to share common lineage-restricted progenitors in vivo Development, February 15, 2006; 133(4): 581 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Poggi, M. Vitorino, I. Masai, and W. A. Harris Influences on neural lineage and mode of division in the zebrafish retina in vivo J. Cell Biol., December 19, 2005; 171(6): 991 - 999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Bladen, W. K. Lam, W. S. Dynan, and D. J. Kozlowski DNA damage response and Ku80 function in the vertebrate embryo Nucleic Acids Res., May 24, 2005; 33(9): 3002 - 3010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||