|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online July 21, 2003
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00630
The Wellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Institute and the Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Rd, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK
¶ Author for correspondence (e-mail: ds139{at}mole.bio.cam.ac.uk)
Accepted 28 May 2003
The anteroposterior axis of Drosophila is defined during oogenesis, when the polarisation of the oocyte microtubule cytoskeleton directs the localisation of bicoid and oskar mRNAs to the anterior and posterior poles, respectively. Although maternal-effect lethal and female-sterile screens have identified many mutants that disrupt these processes, these screens could not recover mutations in essential genes. Here we describe a genetic screen in germline clones for mutants that disrupt the localisation of GFP-Staufen in living oocytes, which overcomes this limitation. As Staufen localises to the posterior with oskar mRNA and to the anterior with bicoid mRNA, it acts as a marker for both poles of the oocyte, allowing the identification of mutants that affect the localisation of either mRNA, as well as mutants that disrupt oocyte polarity. Using this approach, we have identified 23 novel complementation groups on chromosome 3R that disrupt anteroposterior axis formation. Analyses of new alleles of spn-E and orb show that both SPN-E and ORB proteins are required to organise the microtubule cytoskeleton at stage 9, and to prevent premature cytoplasmic streaming. Furthermore, yps mutants partially suppress the premature cytoplasmic streaming of orb mutants. As orb, yps and spn-E encode RNA-binding proteins, they may regulate the translation of unidentified RNAs necessary for the polarisation of the microtubule cytoskeleton.
Key words: oskar, bicoid, Staufen, Polarity, Microtubules, Drosophila
Related articles in Development:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Zeitelhofer, D. Karra, P. Macchi, M. Tolino, S. Thomas, M. Schwarz, M. Kiebler, and R. Dahm Dynamic Interaction between P-Bodies and Transport Ribonucleoprotein Particles in Dendrites of Mature Hippocampal Neurons J. Neurosci., July 23, 2008; 28(30): 7555 - 7562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Song, L. Fee, T. H. Lee, and R. P. Wharton The Molecular Chaperone Hsp90 Is Required for mRNA Localization in Drosophila melanogaster Embryos Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 2213 - 2222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. V. Hartig, Y. Tomari, and K. Forstemann piRNAs--the ancient hunters of genome invaders Genes & Dev., July 15, 2007; 21(14): 1707 - 1713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Scholz, P. McDermott, M. Garnovskaya, T. N. Gallien, S. Huettelmaier, C. DeRienzo, and G. Cooper IV Microtubule-associated protein-4 (MAP-4) inhibits microtubule-dependent distribution of mRNA in isolated neonatal cardiocytes Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2006; 71(3): 506 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. P. Munro, S. Kwon, B. J. Schnapp, and D. St Johnston A repeated IMP-binding motif controls oskar mRNA translation and anchoring independently of Drosophila melanogaster IMP. J. Cell Biol., February 13, 2006; 172(4): 577 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. R. Serbus, B.-J. Cha, W. E. Theurkauf, and W. M. Saxton Dynein and the actin cytoskeleton control kinesin-driven cytoplasmic streaming in Drosophila oocytes Development, August 15, 2005; 132(16): 3743 - 3752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Degot, H. Le Hir, F. Alpy, V. Kedinger, I. Stoll, C. Wendling, B. Seraphin, M.-C. Rio, and C. Tomasetto Association of the Breast Cancer Protein MLN51 with the Exon Junction Complex via Its Speckle Localizer and RNA Binding Module J. Biol. Chem., August 6, 2004; 279(32): 33702 - 33715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. McCormick Control of Male Gametophyte Development PLANT CELL, June 1, 2004; 16(suppl_1): S142 - S153. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
