|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00211
Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
Accepted 17 October 2002
Cell rearrangements are crucial during development. In this study, we use C. elegans gastrulation as a simple model to investigate the mechanisms of cell positioning. During C. elegans gastrulation, two endodermal precursor cells move from the ventral surface to the center of the embryo, leaving a gap between these ingressing cells and the eggshell. Six neighboring cells converge under the endodermal precursors, filling this gap. Using an in vitro system, we observed that these movements occurred consistently in the absence of the eggshell and the vitelline envelope. We found that movement of the neighbors towards each other is not dependent on chemotactic signaling between these cells. We further found that C. elegans gastrulation requires intact microfilaments, but not microtubules. The primary mechanism of microfilament-based motility does not appear to be through protrusive structures, such as lamellipodia or filopodia. Instead, our results suggest an alternative mechanism. We found that myosin activity is required for gastrulation, that the apical sides of the ingressing cells contract, and that the ingressing cells determine the direction of movement of their neighboring cells. Based on these results, we propose that ingression is driven by an actomyosin-based contraction of the apical side of the ingressing cells, which pulls neighboring cells underneath. We conclude that apical constriction can function to position blastomeres in early embryos, even before anchoring junctions form between cells.
Key words: Cell migration, In vitro system, Gastrulation, Morphogenesis, Polarity, Actomyosin cytoskeleton, C. elegans
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. C. Anderson, J. S. Gill, R. M. Cinalli, and J. Nance Polarization of the C. elegans Embryo by RhoGAP-Mediated Exclusion of PAR-6 from Cell Contacts Science, June 27, 2008; 320(5884): 1771 - 1774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 U. Wolke, E. A. Jezuit, and J. R. Priess Actin-dependent cytoplasmic streaming in C. elegans oogenesis Development, June 15, 2007; 134(12): 2227 - 2236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Lee, H. M. Scherr, and J. B. Wallingford Shroom family proteins regulate {gamma}-tubulin distribution and microtubule architecture during epithelial cell shape change Development, April 1, 2007; 134(7): 1431 - 1441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Watters Video Views and Reviews: Gastrulation and the Fashioning of Animal Embryos CBE Life Sci Educ, December 1, 2005; 4(4): 273 - 278. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. J. Heid, J. Geiger, D. Wessels, E. Voss, and D. R. Soll Computer-assisted analysis of filopod formation and the role of myosin II heavy chain phosphorylation in Dictyostelium J. Cell Sci., May 15, 2005; 118(10): 2225 - 2237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. A. Wells and N. LeBrasseur Cells on Parade: The American Society for Cell Biology San Francisco, CA December 13-17, 2003 J. Cell Biol., February 16, 2004; 164(4): 480 - 486. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Nance, E. M. Munro, and J. R. Priess C. elegans PAR-3 and PAR-6 are required for apicobasal asymmetries associated with cell adhesion and gastrulation Development, November 15, 2003; 130(22): 5339 - 5350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
