|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online 24 September 2003
doi: 10.1242/dev.00773
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QH, UK
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: MF1{at}mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk)
Accepted 5 August 2003
Ommatidial rotation in the Drosophila eye provides a striking example of the precision with which tissue patterning can be achieved. Ommatidia in the adult eye are aligned at right angles to the equator, with dorsal and ventral ommatidia pointing in opposite directions. This pattern is established during disc development, when clusters rotate through 90°, a process dependent on planar cell polarity and rotation-specific factors such as Nemo and Scabrous. Here, we demonstrate a requirement for epidermal growth factor receptor (Egfr) signalling in rotation, further adding to the manifold actions of this pathway in eye development. Egfr is distinct from other rotation factors in that the initial process is unaffected, but orientation in the adult is greatly disrupted when signalling is abnormal. We propose that Egfr signalling acts in the third instar imaginal disc to `lock' ommatidia in their final position, and that in its absence, ommatidial orientation becomes disrupted during the remodelling of the larval disc into an adult eye. This lock may be achieved by a change in the adhesive properties of the cells: cadherin-based adhesion is important for ommatidia to remain in their appropriate positions. In addition, we have evidence that there is an error-correction mechanism operating during pupal stages to reposition inappropriately orientated ommatidia. Our results suggest that initial patterning events are not sufficient to achieve the precise architecture of the fly eye, and highlight a novel requirement for error-correction, and for an Egfr-dependent protection function to prevent morphological disruption during tissue remodelling.
Key words: Eye, Patterning, Ommatidial rotation, Adhesion, Epidermal growth factor receptor, spitz, keren, scabrous, nemo, roulette, argos
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  I. Mirkovic and M. Mlodzik Cooperative activities of Drosophila DE-Cadherin and DN-Cadherin regulate the cell motility process of ommatidial rotation Development, September 1, 2006; 133(17): 3283 - 3293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Cela and M. Llimargas Egfr is essential for maintaining epithelial integrity during tracheal remodelling in Drosophila Development, August 15, 2006; 133(16): 3115 - 3125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. D. Vrailas, D. R. Marenda, S. E. Cook, M. A. Powers, J. A. Lorenzen, L. A. Perkins, and K. Moses smoothened and thickveins regulate Moleskin/Importin 7-mediated MAP kinase signaling in the developing Drosophila eye Development, April 15, 2006; 133(8): 1485 - 1494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. B. Rodrigues, E. Werner, and K. Moses Genetic and biochemical analysis of the role of Egfr in the morphogenetic furrow of the developing Drosophila eye Development, November 1, 2005; 132(21): 4697 - 4707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. A. Zeng and E. M. Verheyen Nemo is an inducible antagonist of Wingless signaling during Drosophila wing development Development, June 15, 2004; 131(12): 2911 - 2920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Fanto and H. McNeill Planar polarity from flies to vertebrates J. Cell Sci., February 15, 2004; 117(4): 527 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Gaengel and M. Mlodzik Egfr signaling regulates ommatidial rotation and cell motility in the Drosophila eye via MAPK/Pnt signaling and the Ras effector Canoe/AF6 Development, November 15, 2003; 130(22): 5413 - 5423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
